• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

How consumers evaluate health care quality: Part I.

作者信息

Moore S T, Bopp K D

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211, USA.

出版信息

Health Mark Q. 1999;16(4):1-6. doi: 10.1300/J026v16n04_01.

DOI:10.1300/J026v16n04_01
PMID:11066713
Abstract

Information is a critical factor in marketing health care services. Consumers evaluate information according to its source. This report is the first of a three-part series examining the way in which Americans evaluate the quality of consumer information as they make decisions on health care products and services. This report provides an overview of the study. The next two installations will focus, respectively, on health plans, hospital and doctors.

摘要

相似文献

1
How consumers evaluate health care quality: Part I.
Health Mark Q. 1999;16(4):1-6. doi: 10.1300/J026v16n04_01.
2
How consumers evaluate health care quality: Part II.消费者如何评估医疗保健质量:第二部分。
Health Mark Q. 1999;17(1):1-8.
3
How consumers evaluate health care quality: Part III.消费者如何评估医疗保健质量:第三部分。
Health Mark Q. 1999;17(2):1-6. doi: 10.1300/J026v17n02_01.
4
Study finds purchasers aren't using providers' outcomes data, quality report cards.
Data Strateg Benchmarks. 1998 Feb;2(2):30-2.
5
Issues in the practice of cosmetic surgery: consumers' use of information and perceptions of service quality.整容手术实践中的问题:消费者对信息的使用及对服务质量的认知
J Health Care Mark. 1991 Sep;11(3):12-8.
6
Do consumer reports of health plan quality affect health plan selection?消费者对健康计划质量的报告是否会影响健康计划的选择?
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):933-47.
7
Nursing home selection: replication, decision recency and strategic implications.养老院选择:复制、决策近期性及战略意义。
Health Mark Q. 1992;10(1-2):185-208.
8
Marketing to consumers: unleashing technologies to help the public choose health service options.
Top Health Care Financ. 1992 Spring;18(3):28-37.
9
Reporting of CAHPS quality information to medicare beneficiaries.向医疗保险受益人报告CAHPS质量信息。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Jul;36(3):477-88.
10
A new perspective on consumer health Web use: "valuegraphic" profiles of health information seekers.消费者健康网络使用的新视角:健康信息搜索者的“价值图谱”概况
Manag Care Q. 2001 Spring;9(2):35-43.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Web-Based Ratings on Patient Choice of a Primary Care Physician Versus a Specialist: Randomized Controlled Experiment.基于网络评分对患者选择初级保健医生与专科医生的影响:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 28;21(6):e11188. doi: 10.2196/11188.