Petrou S, Wolstenholme J
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Headington, England.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Jul;18(1):33-43. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018010-00004.
The resources available for healthcare are limited compared with demand, if not need, and all healthcare systems, regardless of their financing and organisation, employ mechanisms to ration or prioritise finite healthcare resources. This paper reviews alternative approaches that can be used to allocate healthcare resources. It discusses the problems encountered when allocating healthcare resources according to free market principles. It then proceeds to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of alternative resource allocation approaches that can be applied to public health systems. These include: (i) approaches based on the concept of meeting the needs of the population to maximising its capacity to benefit from interventions; (ii) economic approaches that identify the most efficient allocation of resources with the view of maximising health benefits or other measures of social welfare; (iii) approaches that seek to ration healthcare by age; and (iv) approaches that resolve resource allocation disputes through debate and bargaining. At present, there appears to be no consensus about the relative importance of the potentially conflicting principles that can be used to guide resource allocation decisions. It is concluded that whatever shape tomorrow's health service takes, the requirement to make equitable and efficient use of finite healthcare resources will remain.
与需求(即便不是与需要)相比,可用于医疗保健的资源是有限的。所有医疗保健系统,无论其筹资方式和组织形式如何,都会采用一些机制来对有限的医疗资源进行配给或确定优先次序。本文回顾了可用于分配医疗资源的不同方法。讨论了按照自由市场原则分配医疗资源时遇到的问题。接着探讨了可应用于公共卫生系统的其他资源分配方法的优缺点。这些方法包括:(i)基于满足人群需求以使其从干预措施中获益的能力最大化这一概念的方法;(ii)旨在通过确定资源的最有效分配以实现健康效益最大化或其他社会福利指标最大化的经济方法;(iii)按年龄对医疗保健进行配给的方法;以及(iv)通过辩论和协商来解决资源分配争议的方法。目前,对于可用于指导资源分配决策的潜在相互冲突的原则的相对重要性,似乎尚未达成共识。结论是,无论未来的医疗服务呈现何种形态,公平且高效地利用有限医疗资源的要求都将持续存在。