Suppr超能文献

非甾体抗炎药治疗腰痛:Cochrane协作网背部回顾小组框架内的系统评价

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group.

作者信息

van Tulder M W, Scholten R J, Koes B W, Deyo R A

机构信息

Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Oct 1;25(19):2501-13. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200010010-00013.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of randomized and double-blind controlled trials was performed.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the most frequently prescribed medications worldwide and are widely used for patients with low back pain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of nonspecific low back pain with or without radiation, and to assess which type of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug is most effective.

METHODS

For this study, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline and Embase, and reference lists of articles were searched. Two reviewers blinded with respect to authors, institution, and journal independently extracted data and assessed the methodologic quality of the studies. If data were considered clinically homogeneous, a meta-analysis was performed. If data were considered clinically heterogeneous, a qualitative analysis was performed using a rating system with four levels of evidence: strong, moderate, limited, and no evidence.

RESULTS

This review involved 51 trials and 6057 patients. Of these trials, 16 (31%) were of high quality. The pooled relative risk for global improvement after 1 week was 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10-1.41), and for additional analgesic use was 1.29 (95% CI = 1.05-1.57), indicating a statistically significant but small effect in favor of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as compared with a placebo. The results of the qualitative analysis showed that there is conflicting evidence (Level 3) that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are more effective than paracetamol for acute low back pain, and that there is moderate evidence (Level 2) that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are not more effective than other drugs for acute low back pain. There is strong evidence (Level 1) that various types of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are equally effective for acute low back pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence from the 51 trials included in this review suggests that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are effective for short-term symptomatic relief in patients with acute low back pain. Furthermore, there does not seem to be a specific type of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that is clearly more effective than others. Sufficient evidence on chronic low back pain still is lacking.

摘要

研究设计

对随机双盲对照试验进行了系统评价。

背景数据总结

非甾体抗炎药是全球处方最频繁的药物,广泛用于腰痛患者。

目的

评估非甾体抗炎药治疗非特异性腰痛(伴或不伴放射痛)的效果,并评估哪种类型的非甾体抗炎药最有效。

方法

本研究检索了Cochrane对照试验注册库、Medline和Embase以及文章的参考文献列表。两名对作者、机构和期刊不知情的评审员独立提取数据并评估研究的方法学质量。如果数据被认为在临床上具有同质性,则进行荟萃分析。如果数据被认为在临床上具有异质性,则使用具有四个证据水平的评分系统进行定性分析:强、中、有限和无证据。

结果

本综述涉及51项试验和6057名患者。其中16项(31%)试验质量高。1周后总体改善的合并相对风险为1.24(95%置信区间[CI]=1.10 - 1.41),额外使用镇痛药的合并相对风险为1.29(95%CI = 1.05 - 1.57),表明与安慰剂相比,非甾体抗炎药有统计学上显著但较小的效果。定性分析结果表明,有相互矛盾的证据(3级)表明非甾体抗炎药治疗急性腰痛比扑热息痛更有效,有中等证据(2级)表明非甾体抗炎药治疗急性腰痛并不比其他药物更有效。有强有力的证据(1级)表明各种类型的非甾体抗炎药治疗急性腰痛同样有效。

结论

本综述纳入的51项试验的证据表明,非甾体抗炎药对急性腰痛患者的短期症状缓解有效。此外,似乎没有一种特定类型的非甾体抗炎药明显比其他药物更有效。关于慢性腰痛仍缺乏充分的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验