Gerdes L U, Jeune B, Ranberg K A, Nybo H, Vaupel J W
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Genet Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;19(3):202-10. doi: 10.1002/1098-2272(200010)19:3<202::AID-GEPI2>3.0.CO;2-Q.
We developed a method to estimate genotype-specific average relative mortality risk, R, from genotype distributions in cross-sectional studies of people belonging to different age-groups, and applied the method to new data from a study of apolipoprotein E genotypes (apoE) in 177 Danish centenarians and data from a study of 40-year-old Danish men. Twenty-one percent of the centenarians were epsilon 2-carriers (genotypes epsilon 2 epsilon 2 and epsilon 3 epsilon 2) and 15% were epsilon 4-carriers (genotypes epsilon 4 epsilon 4 and epsilon 4 epsilon 3) compared to 13 and 29%, respectively, of the young men. The R-values were 0.95 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.02) for epsilon 2-carriers and 1.13 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.22) for epsilon 4-carriers, using epsilon 3 epsilon 3- and epsilon 4 epsilon 2 genotypes as reference. Corresponding values for epsilon 4-carriers were obtained by using published data from a French and a Finnish study of centenarians, whereas the values for epsilon 2-carriers were about 0.90 with these data. The method to estimate mortality risk and the results associate with the view that the apoE gene is a "frailty gene." On the other hand, if odds ratios are used to summarize data from studies of this kind, they are more impressive and may propagate the misconception that apoE is a "longevity gene".
我们开发了一种方法,可根据不同年龄组人群横断面研究中的基因型分布来估计特定基因型的平均相对死亡风险R,并将该方法应用于一项针对177名丹麦百岁老人的载脂蛋白E基因型(apoE)研究的新数据,以及一项针对40岁丹麦男性的研究数据。百岁老人中21%为ε2携带者(基因型ε2ε2和ε3ε2),15%为ε4携带者(基因型ε4ε4和ε4ε3),相比之下,年轻男性中这两个比例分别为13%和29%。以ε3ε3和ε4ε2基因型为参照,ε2携带者的R值为0.95(95%置信区间0.88至1.02),ε4携带者的R值为1.13(95%置信区间1.05至1.22)。ε4携带者的相应值是通过使用法国和芬兰一项百岁老人研究的已发表数据获得的,而这些数据得出的ε2携带者的值约为0.90。估计死亡风险的方法及结果与apoE基因是“脆弱基因”这一观点相符。另一方面,如果使用优势比来总结此类研究的数据,结果会更令人印象深刻,可能会助长apoE是“长寿基因”这一错误观念。