Resnicow K, Wallace D C, Jackson A, Digirolamo A, Odom E, Wang T, Dudley W N, Davis M, Mitchell D, Baranowski T
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
J Cancer Educ. 2000 Fall;15(3):156-63. doi: 10.1080/08858190009528685.
Eat for Life, a multicomponent intervention to increase fruit and vegetable (F & V) consumption among African Americans, is delivered through African American churches.
Fourteen churches were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: 1) comparison; 2) culturally-sensitive multicomponent intervention with one phone call; and 3) culturally-sensitive multicomponent intervention with four phone calls. The intervention included an 18-minute video, a project cookbook, printed health education materials, and several "cues" imprinted with the project logo and a 5 A Day message. A key element of the telephone intervention was the use of motivational interviewing, a counseling technique originally developed for addictive behaviors. Major outcomes for the trial included total F & V intake, assessed by food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs) and 24-hour recalls, and serum carotenoids. Psychosocial variables assessed included outcome expectations, barriers to F & V intake, preference for meat meals, neophobia, social support to eat more F & V, self-efficacy to eat more F & V, and nutrition knowledge.
Baseline mean F & V intakes across the three FFQs ranged from 3.45 to 4.28 servings per day. Intake based on a single 24-hour recall was 3.0 servings. Variables positively correlated with F & V intake included self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and a belief that F & V contain vitamins. Factors negatively correlated with intake include perceived barriers, meat preference, neophobia, and high-fat cooking practices. The completion rate for the first telephone counseling call was 90%. Completion rates for the remaining three calls ranged from 79% to 86%.
The recruitment and intervention methods of the Eat for Life study appear promising. The telephone intervention based on motivational interviewing is potentially useful for delivering dietary counseling.
“为生活而食”是一项旨在增加非裔美国人水果和蔬菜(F&V)摄入量的多成分干预措施,通过非裔美国人教会实施。
14所教会被随机分配到三种治疗条件之一:1)对照组;2)进行一次电话沟通的文化敏感型多成分干预;3)进行四次电话沟通的文化敏感型多成分干预。干预措施包括一段18分钟的视频、一本项目食谱、印刷的健康教育材料,以及一些印有项目标志和“每日五蔬果”信息的“提示物”。电话干预的一个关键要素是使用动机性访谈,这是一种最初为成瘾行为开发的咨询技巧。该试验的主要结果包括通过食物频率问卷(FFQ)和24小时膳食回顾评估的F&V总摄入量,以及血清类胡萝卜素。评估的心理社会变量包括结果期望、F&V摄入的障碍、对肉类膳食的偏好、新食物恐惧症、增加F&V摄入量的社会支持、增加F&V摄入量的自我效能感以及营养知识。
三份FFQ的基线平均F&V摄入量为每天3.45至4.28份。基于单次24小时膳食回顾的摄入量为3.0份。与F&V摄入量呈正相关的变量包括自我效能感、结果期望以及认为F&V含有维生素的信念。与摄入量呈负相关的因素包括感知到的障碍、对肉类的偏好、新食物恐惧症以及高脂肪烹饪习惯。第一次电话咨询的完成率为90%。其余三次电话的完成率在79%至86%之间。
“为生活而食”研究的招募和干预方法似乎很有前景。基于动机性访谈的电话干预对于提供饮食咨询可能是有用的。