Resnicow K, Jackson A, Wang T, De A K, McCarty F, Dudley W N, Baranowski T
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1520 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2001 Oct;91(10):1686-93. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.10.1686.
This study reports on Eat for Life, a multicomponent intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among African Americans that was delivered through Black churches.
Fourteen churches were randomly assigned to 3 treatment conditions: (1) comparison, (2) self-help intervention with 1 telephone cue call, and (3) self-help with 1 cue call and 3 counseling calls. The telephone counseling in group 3 was based on motivational interviewing. The primary outcome, assessed at baseline and 1-year follow-up, was fruit and vegetable intake as assessed by 3 food frequency questionnaires.
Change in fruit and vegetable intake was significantly greater in the motivational interviewing group than in the comparison and self-help groups. The net difference between the motivational interviewing and comparison groups was 1.38, 1.03, and 1.21 servings of fruits and vegetables per day for the 2-item, 7-item, and 36-item food frequency questionnaires, respectively. The net difference between the motivational interviewing and self-help groups was 1.14, 1.10, and 0.97 servings for the 2-item, 7-item, and 36-item food frequency questionnaires, respectively.
Motivational interviewing appears to be a promising strategy for modifying dietary behavior, and Black churches are an excellent setting to implement and evaluate health promotion programs.
本研究报告了“为生活而食”项目,这是一项通过黑人教会开展的多成分干预措施,旨在增加非裔美国人的水果和蔬菜摄入量。
14所教会被随机分配到3种治疗条件下:(1)对照组,(2)有1次电话提示的自助干预组,以及(3)有1次提示电话和3次咨询电话的自助干预组。第3组的电话咨询基于动机性访谈。主要结局指标在基线和1年随访时进行评估,采用3份食物频率问卷评估水果和蔬菜摄入量。
动机性访谈组的水果和蔬菜摄入量变化显著大于对照组和自助干预组。对于2项、7项和36项食物频率问卷,动机性访谈组与对照组每天水果和蔬菜摄入量的净差异分别为1.38份、1.03份和1.21份。动机性访谈组与自助干预组每天水果和蔬菜摄入量的净差异分别为1.14份、1.10份和0.97份。
动机性访谈似乎是改变饮食行为的一种有前景的策略,黑人教会是实施和评估健康促进项目的理想场所。