Monsen Jon T, Hagtvet Knut A, Havik Odd E, Eilertsen Dag E
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Psychol Assess. 2006 Jun;18(2):165-73. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.165.
This study assessed the construct validity of the circumplex model of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-C) in Norwegian clinical and nonclinical samples. Structure was examined by evaluating the fit of the circumplex model to data obtained by the IIP-C. Observer-rated personality disorder criteria (DSM-IV, Axis II) were used as external correlates. The reliability of the IIP-C scales was acceptable and in the same range as in the original version. A multisample analysis strategy did not support an invariant circumplex model across the 2 groups. However, the estimated structures reflected mostly the same circular pattern of a quasi-circumplex model in the 2 groups. Departures from the ideal model were of negligible practical significance. The validity results examining personality disorder correlates of the IIP-C generally conformed to predictions, providing direct evidence for agreement between self-report and expert judgments of interpersonal problems.
本研究评估了人际问题量表(IIP-C)的环性模型在挪威临床样本和非临床样本中的结构效度。通过评估环性模型对IIP-C所获数据的拟合度来检验结构。观察者评定的人格障碍标准(《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版,轴II)用作外部关联指标。IIP-C各分量表的信度可以接受,且与原始版本处于相同范围。多样本分析策略并不支持两组间存在不变的环性模型。然而,估计结构在两组中大多反映了准环性模型的相同圆形模式。与理想模型的偏差在实际意义上可忽略不计。检验IIP-C与人格障碍相关性的效度结果总体上符合预测,为人际问题的自我报告与专家判断之间的一致性提供了直接证据。