Calhoun P S, Earnst K S, Tucker D D, Kirby A C, Beckham J C
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2000 Oct;75(2):338-50. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7502_11.
This study examined whether individuals who were instructed on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed. [DSM-IV]; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) could feign PTSD on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; Morey, 1991). The study also investigated whether PAI indexes of symptom exaggeration, the Negative Impression Management (NIM) scale and the Malingering index, could identify individuals feigning PTSD. The diagnostic rule for PTSD (Morey, 1991, 1996) was applied to the profiles of a group of 23 veterans with combat-related PTSD and 23 male undergraduates instructed to malinger PTSD. Seventy percent of the student malingerers produced profiles that received diagnostic consideration for PTSD. The NIM cutting score (> or = 8) was highly effective in detecting simulation of PTSD but resulted in the misclassification of a large number of true PTSD cases. There were no significant differences in the overall efficiency of the test with various validity criteria. We discuss the implications of these findings for the use of the PAI in the diagnosis of combat-related PTSD.
本研究考察了那些接受过关于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第4版[DSM-IV];美国精神病学协会,1994)标准指导的个体,是否能够在《人格评估量表》(PAI;莫雷,1991)上伪装PTSD。该研究还调查了PAI中症状夸大指数、负面印象管理(NIM)量表和诈病指数,是否能够识别伪装PTSD的个体。PTSD的诊断规则(莫雷,1991年、1996年)被应用于一组23名患有与战斗相关PTSD的退伍军人以及23名被指示伪装PTSD的男性大学生的剖面图。70%的学生伪装者所产生的剖面图得到了PTSD的诊断考量。NIM的划界分数(≥8)在检测PTSD伪装方面非常有效,但导致大量真正的PTSD病例被错误分类。使用各种效度标准时,该测试的总体效率没有显著差异。我们讨论了这些发现对于在与战斗相关的PTSD诊断中使用PAI的意义。