• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北卡罗来纳州各县的地方选择政策与酒精供应情况

Local option policies and alcohol availability in North Carolina counties.

作者信息

Zakocs R C

机构信息

Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health Policy. 2000;21(3):328-41.

PMID:11021046
Abstract

Concerned about social problems related to alcohol, communities are considering legal alternatives for restricting its availability. Whether restrictive local policies are realistic means for curtailing the physical availability of alcohol is unknown. Using North Carolina's 100 counties as the unit of analysis, the extent to which 1994 local option policies predicted 1995 rates of alcohol permits, controlling for other factors related to the demand for alcohol, was examined. Counties with restrictive policies were found to have lower rates of alcohol permits than counties with permissive policies, after accounting for alcohol demand. Local option policies may be a reasonable strategy for limiting the physical availability of alcohol. In turn, limiting alcohol availability may be effective in reducing alcohol-related community problems such as traffic crashes and violent assaults.

摘要

由于担心与酒精相关的社会问题,各社区正在考虑通过合法途径来限制酒精的供应。目前尚不清楚限制性的地方政策是否是减少酒精实际供应的现实手段。以北卡罗来纳州的100个县为分析单位,研究了在控制与酒精需求相关的其他因素的情况下,1994年的地方选择政策对1995年酒精许可证发放率的预测程度。在考虑了酒精需求之后,发现实施限制性政策的县的酒精许可证发放率低于实施宽松政策的县。地方选择政策可能是限制酒精实际供应的合理策略。反过来,限制酒精供应可能有效地减少与酒精相关的社区问题,如交通事故和暴力袭击。

相似文献

1
Local option policies and alcohol availability in North Carolina counties.北卡罗来纳州各县的地方选择政策与酒精供应情况
J Public Health Policy. 2000;21(3):328-41.
2
Public opinion on alcohol service at licensed premises: a population survey in Stockholm, Sweden 1999-2000.瑞典斯德哥尔摩1999 - 2000年关于有执照场所酒精饮料服务的民意调查
Health Policy. 2005 Jun;72(3):265-78. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.09.001.
3
Alcohol availability and motor vehicle fatalities.酒精供应与机动车交通事故死亡率。
J Adolesc Health. 1996 Nov;19(5):325-30. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(96)00089-4.
4
Effects on alcohol related fatal crashes of a community based initiative to increase substance abuse treatment and reduce alcohol availability.一项基于社区的旨在增加药物滥用治疗及减少酒精可获得性的倡议对与酒精相关的致命撞车事故的影响。
Inj Prev. 2005 Apr;11(2):84-90. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.006353.
5
Public sentiment towards alcohol and local government alcohol policies in New Zealand.新西兰民众对酒精和地方政府酒类政策的态度。
Int J Drug Policy. 2012 Jan;23(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.05.019. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
6
ALCOHOL IN OUR LIVES: A once-in-a generation opportunity for liquor law reform in New Zealand.酒精在我们生活中的影响:新西兰酒类法律改革一代人仅有一次的机遇。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010 Jan;29(1):1-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00139.x.
7
Commercial availability of alcohol to young people: results of alcohol purchase attempts.向年轻人销售酒精饮料的商业情况:购买酒精饮料尝试的结果
Prev Med. 1995 Jul;24(4):342-7. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1056.
8
Recommendations on privatization of alcohol retail sales and prevention of excessive alcohol consumption and related harms.关于酒类零售私有化和预防过度饮酒及相关危害的建议。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):428-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.12.006.
9
Health risks of including alcohol and tobacco in PICTA free trade.在《太平洋岛国贸易协定》自由贸易中纳入酒精和烟草的健康风险。
Pac Health Dialog. 2004 Mar;11(1):116-20.
10
How will minimum unit price for alcohol be enforced?酒精饮料的最低限价将如何实施?
BMJ. 2012 Apr 18;344:e2722. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2722.