• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[噪声所致职业性听力损失的自然史]

[Natural history of occupational hearing loss induced by noise].

作者信息

de Almeida S I, Albernaz P L, Zaia P A, Xavier O G, Karazawa E H

机构信息

Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Distúrbios da Comunicação Humana, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina.

出版信息

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2000 Apr-Jun;46(2):143-58.

PMID:11022355
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical and audiometric characteristics of occupational hearing loss induced by noise, according to age and time of exposition in years.

METHODS

222 patients with occupational sensorineural hearing loss induced by noise were studied retrospectively, correlating the auditive clinical claims, alterations of audiometric thresholds at frequencies of 250 Hz to 8000 Hz, speech discrimination indicator with age and time of exposure. As a control group were used the audiometric threshold of a population of same medium age, without morbid antecedents of hearing illness, as preconized by ISO 1999 (1990). The group were divided into subgroups and three decades of exposure were analyzed.

RESULTS

It was verified that the clinical claims of hipoacusia increases according to the age and time of exposure. The frequency of tinnitus is constant. The audiometric thresholds in the second decade of exposure present variations that depend on the age. The several audiometric curves are parallel, but they are not horizontal. The worst thresholds were found in the high frequencies from 3000 Hz to 8000 Hz, as a clinical and physiopathological consequences of the commitment of basal areas of cochlea. The speech discrimination showed to be worst according to the increase of age and time of exposure.

CONCLUSION

Patients with hearing loss disacusia induced by occupational noise present characteristic audiometric thresholds that vary according to age and time of exposure to noise. These characteristics defined and resumed in audiometric curves can constitute a standard of comparison, evaluation and control for exposed populations.

摘要

目的

根据年龄和暴露年限评估噪声所致职业性听力损失的临床和听力特征。

方法

对222例噪声所致职业性感音神经性听力损失患者进行回顾性研究,将听觉临床主诉、250Hz至8000Hz频率的听力阈值变化、言语辨别指标与年龄和暴露时间相关联。按照ISO 1999(1990)的规定,以年龄相仿、无听力疾病病史人群的听力阈值作为对照组。将该组患者分为亚组并分析三个暴露十年期的情况。

结果

证实听力减退的临床主诉随年龄和暴露时间增加。耳鸣频率恒定。暴露第二个十年期的听力阈值变化取决于年龄。多条听力曲线平行,但并非水平。在3000Hz至8000Hz高频段发现最差阈值,这是耳蜗基底区域受累的临床和生理病理后果。言语辨别能力随年龄和暴露时间增加而变差。

结论

职业噪声所致听力损失患者呈现出根据年龄和噪声暴露时间而变化的特征性听力阈值。这些在听力曲线中得以界定和概括的特征可构成暴露人群的比较、评估和控制标准。

相似文献

1
[Natural history of occupational hearing loss induced by noise].[噪声所致职业性听力损失的自然史]
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2000 Apr-Jun;46(2):143-58.
2
Methodological issues when comparing hearing thresholds of a group with population standards: the case of the ferry engineers.将一组人群的听力阈值与总体标准进行比较时的方法学问题:渡轮工程师的案例。
Ear Hear. 2006 Oct;27(5):526-37. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000233863.39603.f5.
3
Predicting hearing thresholds in occupational noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady state responses.通过听觉稳态反应预测职业性噪声性听力损失的听阈
Ear Hear. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):330-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000001.
4
[Findings of standard and high-frequency audiometry in workers exposed to occupational noise for long durations].长期暴露于职业噪声环境的工人的标准及高频听力测定结果
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2003 Apr;10(4):137-42.
5
[Risk of noise-induced hearing loss in farm tractor operators].[农场拖拉机操作员噪声性听力损失的风险]
Med Pr. 2001;52(4):265-70.
6
The impact of arterial sclerosis on hearing with and without occupational noise exposure: a population-based aging study in males.有无职业性噪声暴露情况下动脉粥样硬化对听力的影响:一项基于人群的男性老龄化研究
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2010 Oct;37(5):558-64. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
7
The likelihood of detecting a significant hearing threshold shift among noise-exposed workers subjected to annual audiometric testing.在接受年度听力测试的噪声暴露工人中检测到显著听力阈值变化的可能性。
Ann Occup Hyg. 1990 Aug;34(4):361-70. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/34.4.361.
8
Predicting hearing thresholds and occupational hearing loss with multiple-frequency auditory steady-state responses.多频稳态听觉反应预测听力阈值和职业性听力损失。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Oct;39(5):504-10.
9
Hearing loss in relation to sound exposure of professional symphony orchestra musicians.职业交响乐团音乐家的听力损失与声音暴露的关系。
Ear Hear. 2014 Jul-Aug;35(4):448-60. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000029.
10
[Audiometric evaluation in extended high frequencies of individuals exposed to occupational noise].[职业噪声暴露个体的扩展高频听力测定评估]
Pro Fono. 2004 Sep-Dec;16(3):237-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Time Trend of Occupational Noise-induced Hearing Loss in a Metallurgical Plant With a Hearing Conservation Program.一家实施听力保护计划的冶金厂职业性噪声性听力损失的时间趋势
Saf Health Work. 2024 Jun;15(2):181-186. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2024.04.001. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
2
Assessment of noise level and risk of hearing loss among musicians.音乐家噪声水平及听力损失风险评估
Rev Bras Med Trab. 2021 Mar 3;18(4):457-463. doi: 10.47626/1679-4435-2020-591.
3
Evoked otoacoustic emissions in workers exposed to noise: A review.噪声暴露工人的诱发耳声发射:综述
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Oct;16(4):515-22. doi: 10.7162/S1809-97772012000400014.
4
Audiogram comparison of workers from five professional categories.五个专业类别的工人听力图比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:201494. doi: 10.1155/2015/201494. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
5
Speech recognition index of workers with tinnitus exposed to environmental or occupational noise: a comparative study.噪声暴露工人耳鸣的语音识别指数:一项对比研究。
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2012 Dec 22;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-7-26.
6
Acoustic and psychoacoustic analysis of the noise produced by the police force firearms.警用枪支噪声的声学和心理声学分析。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Mar-Apr;77(2):163-70. doi: 10.1590/s1808-86942011000200005.
7
Exposure to occupational noise: otoacoustic emissions test alterations.职业噪声暴露:耳声发射测试改变
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 May-Jun;72(3):362-6. doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30969-1.