• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Exploring the cognitive basis of right-hemisphere pragmatic language disorders.

作者信息

McDonald S

机构信息

Scholl of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2000 Oct 15;75(1):82-107. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2342.

DOI:10.1006/brln.2000.2342
PMID:11023640
Abstract

Despite considerable interest in the linguistic dimensions of right-hemisphere (RH) pragmatic language disorders, the cognitive bases for these are rarely examined. This study investigated two alternative explanations. First, RH pragmatic language disorders may reflect failure of the RH to synthesise incoming and preexisting information, verbal and visuospatial. In this case language and visuospatial performance should covary. Alternatively such disorders may reflect damage to executive control of all cognitive processing secondary to frontal system failure. In this case language and executive function would be associated. Further, in the former case, subjects should be insensitive to the plausibility of information, whereas in the latter they would be fixated by the literal meaning of information and therefore highly sensitive to plausibility. Eighteen patients with RH damage were compared to 20 matched controls on a range of language and neuropsychological tasks. Pragmatic performance was generally correlated to RH (visuospatial) function, not to executive function. Nonetheless RH patients were found to have problems ignoring plausibility. Thus the specific RH hypothesis described needs to be reconsidered.

摘要

相似文献

1
Exploring the cognitive basis of right-hemisphere pragmatic language disorders.
Brain Lang. 2000 Oct 15;75(1):82-107. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2342.
2
Visuospatial deficits in patients with early left-hemispheric lesions and functional reorganization of language: consequence of lesion or reorganization?早期左半球病变患者的视觉空间缺陷与语言功能重组:病变的后果还是重组的结果?
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1088-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.022. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
3
Processing of basic speech acts following localized brain damage: a new light on the neuroanatomy of language.局部脑损伤后基本言语行为的加工:语言神经解剖学的新视角
Brain Cogn. 2005 Mar;57(2):214-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.047.
4
Effects of right- and left-hemisphere damage on understanding conversational implicatures.左右脑半球损伤对理解会话含义的影响。
Brain Lang. 1999 Jul;68(3):566-90. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2129.
5
Patterns of language dominance in focal left and right hemisphere epilepsies: relation to MRI findings, EEG, sex, and age at onset of epilepsy.左侧和右侧半球局灶性癫痫的语言优势模式:与MRI表现、脑电图、性别及癫痫发作起始年龄的关系
Brain Cogn. 1997 Mar;33(2):135-50. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1997.0888.
6
Italian Right Hemisphere Language Battery: the normative study.意大利语右半球语言测试组:规范研究
Neurol Sci. 2005 Apr;26(1):13-25. doi: 10.1007/s10072-005-0377-x.
7
Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic pragmatic ability is better preserved in left-hemisphere-damaged patients than in right-hemisphere-damaged patients.神经语用学:与右半球损伤患者相比,左半球损伤患者的语言外语用能力保留得更好。
Brain Lang. 2006 Jul;98(1):12-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.01.001. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
8
Is problem solving dependent on language?解决问题是否依赖于语言?
Brain Lang. 2005 Mar;92(3):240-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.103.
9
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
10
Stimulus-dominance effects and lateral asymmetries for language in normal subjects and in patients with a single functional hemisphere.正常受试者和单功能半球患者语言的刺激优势效应及侧向不对称性。
Brain Cogn. 2004 Oct;56(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.05.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Pragmatic Communication Deficit and Functional Outcome in Patients with Right- and Left-Brain Damage: A Pilot Study.右脑和左脑损伤患者的语用交流缺陷与功能结局:一项初步研究
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 16;14(4):387. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14040387.
2
An Analysis of Right Hemisphere Stroke Discourse in the Modern Cookie Theft Picture.现代饼干盗窃案图片中的右脑半球中风话语分析。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Oct 25;31(5S):2301-2312. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00294. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
3
Reviving pragmatic theory of theory of mind.重振心智理论的实用主义理论。
AIMS Neurosci. 2018 Apr 20;5(2):116-131. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2018.2.116. eCollection 2018.
4
Pragmatic Language Disorder in Parkinson's Disease and the Potential Effect of Cognitive Reserve.帕金森病中的语用语言障碍及认知储备的潜在影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 19;10:1220. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01220. eCollection 2019.
5
Executive functions assessment in patients with language impairment A systematic review.语言障碍患者的执行功能评估:一项系统综述。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2018 Jul-Sep;12(3):272-283. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642018dn12-030008.
6
The Affective Nature of Formulaic Language: A Right-Hemisphere Subcortical Process.程式化语言的情感本质:一种右半球皮层下过程。
Front Neurol. 2018 Jul 24;9:573. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00573. eCollection 2018.
7
Inference comprehension in text reading: Performance of individuals with right- versus left-hemisphere lesions and the influence of cognitive functions.文本阅读中的推理理解:左右半球病变个体的表现及认知功能的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197195. eCollection 2018.
8
Pragmatic Ability Deficit in Schizophrenia and Associated Theory of Mind and Executive Function.精神分裂症中的语用能力缺陷及相关的心理理论与执行功能
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 11;8:2164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02164. eCollection 2017.
9
Pragmatic and executive functions in traumatic brain injury and right brain damage: An exploratory comparative study.创伤性脑损伤和右脑损伤中的实用功能与执行功能:一项探索性比较研究。
Dement Neuropsychol. 2011 Oct-Dec;5(4):337-345. doi: 10.1590/S1980-57642011DN05040013.
10
Brain basis of communicative actions in language.语言中交际行为的脑基础。
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:857-867. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.055. Epub 2015 Oct 23.