Department of Physical Therapy, Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, and Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197195. eCollection 2018.
Right-hemisphere lesions (RHL) may impair inference comprehension. However, comparative studies between left-hemisphere lesions (LHL) and RHL are rare, especially regarding reading comprehension. Moreover, further knowledge of the influence of cognition on inferential processing in this task is needed.
To compare the performance of patients with RHL and LHL on an inference reading comprehension task. We also aimed to analyze the effects of lesion site and to verify correlations between cognitive functions and performance on the task.
Seventy-five subjects were equally divided into the groups RHL, LHL, and control group (CG). The Implicit Management Test was used to evaluate inference comprehension. In this test, subjects read short written passages and subsequently answer five types of questions (explicit, logical, distractor, pragmatic, and other), which require different types of inferential reasoning. The cognitive functional domains of attention, memory, executive functions, language, and visuospatial abilities were assessed using the Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test (CLQT).
The LHL and RHL groups presented difficulties in inferential comprehension in comparison with the CG. However, the RHL group presented lower scores than the LHL group on logical, pragmatic and other questions. A covariance analysis did not show any effect of lesion site within the hemispheres. Overall, all cognitive domains were correlated with all the types of questions from the inference test (especially logical, pragmatic, and other). Attention and visuospatial abilities affected the scores of both the RHL and LHL groups, and only memory influenced the performance of the RHL group.
Lesions in either hemisphere may cause difficulties in making inferences during reading. However, processing more complex inferences was more difficult for patients with RHL than for those with LHL, which suggests that the right hemisphere plays an important role in tasks with higher comprehension demands. Cognition influences inferential processing during reading in brain-injured subjects.
右脑损伤(RHL)可能会损害推理理解能力。然而,左脑损伤(LHL)与 RHL 之间的比较研究很少,尤其是关于阅读理解。此外,还需要进一步了解认知对该任务推理处理的影响。
比较 RHL 和 LHL 患者在推理阅读理解任务上的表现。我们还旨在分析病灶部位的影响,并验证认知功能与任务表现之间的相关性。
75 名受试者被平均分为 RHL 组、LHL 组和对照组(CG)。使用内隐管理测试评估推理理解能力。在这个测试中,受试者阅读简短的书面段落,然后回答五种类型的问题(显性、逻辑、干扰、语用和其他),这些问题需要不同类型的推理。使用认知语言快速测试(CLQT)评估注意力、记忆、执行功能、语言和视空间能力等认知功能领域。
与 CG 相比,LHL 和 RHL 组在推理理解方面都存在困难。然而,与 LHL 组相比,RHL 组在逻辑、语用和其他问题上的得分较低。协方差分析显示,在半球内,病灶部位没有任何影响。总体而言,所有认知领域都与推理测试的所有类型的问题相关(尤其是逻辑、语用和其他)。注意力和视空间能力影响 RHL 和 LHL 组的得分,只有记忆影响 RHL 组的表现。
大脑半球损伤可能导致阅读时推理困难。然而,对于 RHL 患者来说,处理更复杂的推理比 LHL 患者更困难,这表明右半球在需要更高理解能力的任务中起着重要作用。认知会影响脑损伤患者阅读时的推理处理。