Montemurro Sonia, Mondini Sara, Signorini Matteo, Marchetto Anna, Bambini Valentina, Arcara Giorgio
Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Human Inspired Technology Research Centre, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 19;10:1220. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01220. eCollection 2019.
It is known that patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) may show deficits in several areas of cognition, including speech and language abilities. One domain of particular interest is pragmatics, which refers to the capacity of using language in context for a successful communication. Several studies showed that some specific aspects of pragmatics - both in production and in comprehension - might be impaired in patients with PD. However, a clear picture of pragmatic abilities in PD is still missing, as most of the existing studies focused on specific aspects of the pragmatic competence rather than on sketching a complete pragmatic profile. Moreover, little is known on the potential role of protective factors in compensating the decline of communicative skills as the disease progresses. The present study has two aims: (1) to provide a complete picture of pragmatic abilities in patients with PD, by using a comprehensive battery (Assessment of Pragmatic Abilities and Cognitive Substrates, APACS) and by investigating the relationship with other aspects of cognitive functioning (e.g., working memory and Theory of Mind) and (2) to investigate whether Cognitive Reserve, i.e., the resilience to cognitive impairment provided by life experiences and activities, may compensate for the progressive pragmatic deficits in PD. We found that patients with PD, compared to healthy matched controls, had worse performance in discourse production and in the description of scenes, and that these impairments were tightly correlated with the severity of motor impairment, suggesting reduced intentionality of engaging in a communicative exchange. Patients with PD showed also an impairment in comprehending texts and humor, suggesting a problem in inferring from stories, which was related to general cognitive impairment. Notably, we did not find any significant difference between patients and controls in figurative language comprehension, a domain that is commonly impaired in other neurodegenerative diseases. This might be indicative of a specific profile of pragmatic impairment in patients with PD, worth of further investigation. Finally, Cognitive Reserve measures showed a high degree of association with pragmatic comprehension abilities, suggesting that the modification of life-styles could be a good candidate for compensating the possible problems in understanding the pragmatic aspects of language experienced by patients with PD.
众所周知,帕金森病(PD)患者可能在多个认知领域表现出缺陷,包括言语和语言能力。一个特别受关注的领域是语用学,它指的是在语境中运用语言以实现成功交流的能力。多项研究表明,语用学的一些特定方面——无论是在表达还是理解方面——在PD患者中可能会受损。然而,PD患者语用能力的清晰图景仍不明确,因为大多数现有研究关注的是语用能力的特定方面,而非勾勒出完整的语用概况。此外,对于保护因素在疾病进展过程中补偿沟通技能下降方面的潜在作用知之甚少。本研究有两个目的:(1)通过使用一套综合测试(语用能力与认知底物评估,APACS)并研究其与认知功能其他方面(如工作记忆和心理理论)的关系,来全面了解PD患者的语用能力;(2)研究认知储备,即生活经历和活动所提供的对认知障碍的恢复力,是否可以补偿PD患者逐渐出现的语用缺陷。我们发现,与健康匹配对照组相比,PD患者在话语产出和场景描述方面表现更差,并且这些损伤与运动障碍的严重程度密切相关,这表明参与交流互动的意图降低。PD患者在理解文本和幽默方面也存在损伤,这表明从故事中进行推理存在问题,这与一般认知障碍有关。值得注意的是,我们发现患者和对照组在比喻语言理解方面没有显著差异,而在其他神经退行性疾病中,这一领域通常会受损。这可能表明PD患者存在特定的语用损伤特征,值得进一步研究。最后,认知储备测量结果显示与语用理解能力高度相关,这表明改变生活方式可能是补偿PD患者在理解语言语用方面可能出现的问题的一个良好选择。