• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们的新毕业生更喜欢如何学习?

How do our new graduates prefer to learn?

作者信息

Amin Z

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, K K Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 2000 Jul;41(7):317-23.

PMID:11026797
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Learning preference refers to one's choice of specific learning situations or environments over the other. It is one of the factors needed to be considered in planning curriculum and in designing instructional units.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objectives of this study were to characterize the learning preference of recent medical graduates of the National University of Singapore (NUS) and to identify any possible gender differences. This study is likely to be first of its kind in this learner population.

INSTRUMENT

Rezler's Learning Preference Inventory.

METHODS

Rezler's Learning Preference Inventory was administered among twenty-eight 1997 graduates (male 16, female 12) of NUS. The independent variable was the gender and the dependent variables were the scores in each of the learning categories: abstract, concrete, teacher-structured, student-structured, interpersonal, and independent.

ANALYSIS

Frequency distribution of the learning preferences was counted manually. Independent samples t-test was used to compare two groups of dependent variables.

RESULTS

Ninety-two percent female and sixty-nine percent male respondents preferred concrete learning. Only one male respondent and none of the female respondents preferred abstract learning. Among all the respondents, differences between concrete and abstract categories reached statistical, as well as meaningful, significance (p < 0.0001 and mean score difference of 19.9). Differences between student-structured and teacher-structured, and between interpersonal and independent categories did not reach statistical significance (p value of 0.51 and 0.78 respectively). Female respondents generally showed a trend towards greater preference for concrete and teacher-structured learning than their male counterparts.

CONCLUSION

The learning preferences of recent graduates of the NUS is characterized by high inclination towards concrete learning. The results can be utilized in designing instructional methods for this group of learners.

摘要

背景

学习偏好是指一个人对特定学习情境或环境的选择偏好,它是课程规划和教学单元设计中需要考虑的因素之一。

目的

本研究的主要目的是描述新加坡国立大学近期医学毕业生的学习偏好,并确定是否存在性别差异。在这类学习者群体中,本研究可能尚属首次。

工具

雷兹勒学习偏好量表。

方法

对新加坡国立大学1997届的28名毕业生(男性16名,女性12名)施测雷兹勒学习偏好量表。自变量为性别,因变量为每个学习类别(抽象、具体、教师主导、学生主导、人际互动和自主学习)的得分。

分析

手动统计学习偏好的频率分布。使用独立样本t检验比较两组因变量。

结果

92%的女性受访者和69%的男性受访者偏好具体学习。只有一名男性受访者偏好抽象学习,女性受访者中无人偏好抽象学习。在所有受访者中,具体学习和抽象学习类别之间的差异具有统计学意义和实际意义(p<0.0001,平均得分差异为19.9)。学生主导和教师主导类别之间以及人际互动和自主学习类别之间的差异未达到统计学意义(p值分别为0.51和0.78)。女性受访者总体上比男性受访者更倾向于具体学习和教师主导的学习方式。

结论

新加坡国立大学近期毕业生的学习偏好特点是高度倾向于具体学习。研究结果可用于为这组学习者设计教学方法。

相似文献

1
How do our new graduates prefer to learn?我们的新毕业生更喜欢如何学习?
Singapore Med J. 2000 Jul;41(7):317-23.
2
Learning styles of preclinical students in a medical college in western Nepal.尼泊尔西部一所医学院校临床前学生的学习风格
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2006 Jul-Sep;4(3):390-5.
3
Validation of learning style measures: implications for medical education practice.学习风格测量的验证:对医学教育实践的启示
Med Educ. 2006 Jun;40(6):576-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02476.x.
4
Learning style preferences of allied health practitioners in a teacher education program.教师教育项目中健康相关专业从业者的学习风格偏好
J Allied Health. 1983 Feb;12(1):48-55.
5
Learning preferences of medical students.医学生的学习偏好。
Med Educ. 1994 May;28(3):180-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02696.x.
6
The first batch of graduates of a new medical curriculum in Asia: how their teachers see them.亚洲一门新医学课程的首批毕业生:他们的老师如何看待他们。
Med Educ. 2004 Sep;38(9):980-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01910.x.
7
Matching student personality types and learning preferences to teaching methodologies.将学生的性格类型和学习偏好与教学方法相匹配。
J Dent Educ. 2006 Jun;70(6):644-51.
8
Student learning preferences reflect curricular change.
Med Teach. 2002 Jan;24(1):32-40. doi: 10.1080/00034980120103450.
9
Implementation of Integrated Learning Program in neurosciences during first year of traditional medical course: perception of students and faculty.传统医学课程第一年神经科学综合学习计划的实施:学生和教师的看法
BMC Med Educ. 2008 Sep 24;8:44. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-8-44.
10
Non-academic attributes of hidden curriculum in medical schools.医学院校隐性课程的非学术属性
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Jan;23(1):5-9.