Winter C C
J Urol. 1975 Nov;114(5):755-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)67135-0.
Of 4 methods for testing random urine samples for the presence of infection the standard hospital laboratory culture-colony counting was found by far to be the most accurate. Microscopy of urinary sediment, Microstix and Bacturcult produced too many falsely negative results to be useful in a clinical setting, were urine samples were collected throughout the day such as in an office or hospital outpatient clinic. Perhaps the last 2 tests would yield better results if urine samples were collected after at least 4 hours of incubation time in the bladder, as suggested by their proponents.
在检测随机尿液样本是否存在感染的4种方法中，标准的医院实验室培养-菌落计数法被发现是目前最准确的。尿沉渣显微镜检查、尿试纸条检测和细菌培养检测产生了太多假阴性结果，在临床环境中没有用处，因为在办公室或医院门诊等场所，尿液样本是全天收集的。也许按照其支持者的建议，如果在膀胱中至少孵育4小时后收集尿液样本，后两种检测方法会产生更好的结果。
