Suppr超能文献

菌尿筛查:微试纸条和浸试片。

Screening for bacteriuria: Microstix and dipslides.

作者信息

Hamilton-Miller J M, Brumfitt W, Brooks S J, Bakhtiar M

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 1977 May;53(619):248-50. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.53.619.248.

Abstract

The Microstix system has been tested, in parallel with dipslides, for suitability as a screening technique for the detection of bacteriuria. Results obtained using each method on 228 urine specimens were assessed by comparison with the results of quantitative counts. Dipslides had a higher sensitivity (86-7%) than Microstix. The best specificity (100%) was obtained from those results (77-6%) where both components of the Microstix system were in agreement. Advantages of Microstix are its greater shelf-life and its compactness.

摘要

已将Microstix系统与浸涂玻片法同时进行测试,以评估其作为检测菌尿症筛查技术的适用性。通过与定量计数结果相比较,对使用这两种方法检测228份尿液标本所得结果进行了评估。浸涂玻片法的灵敏度(86.7%)高于Microstix系统。当Microstix系统的两个组件结果一致时(77.6%),特异性最高(100%)。Microstix系统的优点是保质期更长且更为紧凑。

相似文献

1
Screening for bacteriuria: Microstix and dipslides.菌尿筛查:微试纸条和浸试片。
Postgrad Med J. 1977 May;53(619):248-50. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.53.619.248.
3
Microstix-A reagent strip for urine culture.
N Z Med J. 1975 Nov 26;82(552):331-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验