Barbin G K, Thorley J D, Reinarz J A
J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Mar;7(3):286-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.3.286-289.1978.
Simplified urine microscopy, nitrite testing, and dipstick culture were compared with urine loop streak culture colony counts in 219 random voided specimens to determine the accuracy of the three rapid screening techniques. Nitrite testing resulted in 65% false negative results, which could not be significantly improved by incubation at 37 degrees C but which could be improved by adding nitrate substrate before incubation. Dipstick culture could not be quantitated until after 18 h of incubation. A new, simplified microscopy technique, using unspun, unstained urine, resulted in 4% false negative results and 4% false positive results in specimens containing over 10(5) organisms per ml and was the best method Centrifuges, Gram staining reagents, and counting chambers are not necessary for accurate microscopic screening of random urine specimens for the presence of bacteriuria by this technique, and the results are immediately available.
对219份随机排尿标本的简化尿显微镜检查、亚硝酸盐检测和试纸条培养与尿环划线培养菌落计数进行了比较,以确定这三种快速筛查技术的准确性。亚硝酸盐检测产生了65%的假阴性结果,在37℃孵育并不能显著改善,但在孵育前添加硝酸盐底物可以改善。试纸条培养在孵育18小时后才能定量。一种新的简化显微镜技术,使用未离心、未染色的尿液,在每毫升含有超过10⁵个细菌的标本中产生了4%的假阴性结果和4%的假阳性结果,是最好的方法。通过这种技术对随机尿液标本进行细菌尿的准确显微镜筛查,不需要离心机、革兰氏染色试剂和计数室,结果可立即获得。