Suppr超能文献

常规产前护理中灵活性的随机对照试验。

A randomised controlled trial of flexibility in routine antenatal care.

作者信息

Jewell D, Sharp D, Sanders J, Peters T J

机构信息

Division of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2000 Oct;107(10):1241-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11614.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes in satisfaction associated with a flexible approach to antenatal care schedules offered to women at low obstetric risk.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Eleven primary care centres providing midwifery care in Avon.

PARTICIPANTS

Six hundred and nine women at low risk of obstetric complications presenting for antenatal care.

METHODS

A standard antenatal care schedule ('traditional care') was compared with a schedule based on a minimum number of visits and additional visits with timing agreed between women and midwives ('flexible care').

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Women's attitudes to pregnancy and motherhood using a subscale of the Maternal Adjustment and Maternal Attitudes scale, satisfaction with antenatal care, and perception of the speed of recognition of antenatal complications.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the two groups in terms of attitudes to pregnancy and motherhood (mean difference on Maternal Adjustment and Maternal Attitudes scale -0.64, 95% CI -1.39 to 0.11, P = 0.068) and no difference in the proportions of women reporting antenatal problems as soon as possible (traditional group 74.5%, flexible group 76.4%, difference -2%, 95% CI -12.1 to 8.2, P = 0.70). Women receiving traditional care reported higher levels of satisfaction for the care provided by community midwives (P < 0.01). Women receiving flexible care were more likely to report having a choice over the number and timing of their antenatal visits (P < 0.001), but were also more likely to report that they would like to have been seen more often (P < 0.01). There was no difference between the groups in rates of obstetric complications.

CONCLUSIONS

An imposed reduction in antenatal visits has been reported to increase dissatisfaction in other studies. In this study, encouraging women to adopt a flexible approach to antenatal care resulted in a similar finding. Successful implementation of such approaches may depend on more careful selection of women who welcome such an approach, more encouragement to pregnant women to express their own needs and greater feelings of commitment on the part of the care providers.

摘要

目的

评估为低产科风险女性提供灵活的产前检查时间表所带来的满意度变化。

设计

随机对照试验。

地点

在埃文郡提供助产护理的11个初级保健中心。

参与者

609名前来进行产前检查的低产科并发症风险女性。

方法

将标准产前检查时间表(“传统护理”)与基于最少就诊次数以及女性与助产士商定就诊时间的额外就诊次数的时间表(“灵活护理”)进行比较。

主要结局指标

使用“母亲适应与母亲态度量表”的一个子量表评估女性对怀孕和为人母的态度、对产前护理的满意度以及对产前并发症识别速度的认知。

结果

两组在对怀孕和为人母的态度方面无差异(“母亲适应与母亲态度量表”上的平均差异为 -0.64,95%置信区间为 -1.39至0.11,P = 0.068),在尽快报告产前问题的女性比例方面也无差异(传统组74.5%,灵活组76.4%,差异为 -2%,95%置信区间为 -12.1至8.2,P = 0.70)。接受传统护理的女性对社区助产士提供的护理满意度更高(P < 0.01)。接受灵活护理的女性更有可能报告对产前就诊的次数和时间有选择权(P < 0.001),但也更有可能报告希望能更频繁地接受检查(P < 0.01)。两组在产科并发症发生率方面无差异。

结论

在其他研究中,据报道强制减少产前检查次数会增加不满情绪。在本研究中,鼓励女性采用灵活的产前护理方式也得出了类似的结果。成功实施此类方法可能取决于更谨慎地选择欢迎这种方式的女性、更多地鼓励孕妇表达自身需求以及护理提供者更强的责任感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验