Souza P E, Yueh B, Sarubbi M, Loovis C F
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle 98105, USA.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000 Jul-Aug;37(4):473-81.
Although most clinical tests focus on how much a particular hearing aid improves speech audibility under controlled conditions, it is unclear how these measures relate to hearing aid effectiveness, or the benefit perceived by the patient under everyday conditions. In this study, the relationship between audibility and hearing aid effectiveness was examined in a cohort of patients who obtained hearing aids through the Veteran's Administration. The measure of audibility was the Articulation Index, a common index of speech audibility. Measures of effectiveness included two hearing-specific surveys and self-reported ratings of global satisfaction and hearing aid use adherence. Results indicated that there were no systematic relationships between measurements of improved audibility and patient ratings of communication ability. Additionally, improved audibility was not related to overall satisfaction with the amplification characteristics of the hearing aid (fitting). However, improved audibility is related to hearing aid use adherence, with patients who achieve better audibility reporting that they use their hearing aids more frequently.
尽管大多数临床试验关注的是特定助听器在可控条件下能在多大程度上提高言语可听度,但尚不清楚这些指标与助听器的有效性,或患者在日常条件下所感受到的益处之间有何关联。在本研究中,我们在一组通过退伍军人管理局获得助听器的患者中,考察了可听度与助听器有效性之间的关系。可听度的衡量指标是清晰度指数,这是一种常用的言语可听度指标。有效性的衡量指标包括两项针对听力的调查,以及自我报告的总体满意度和助听器使用依从性评分。结果表明,言语可听度改善的测量结果与患者沟通能力评分之间不存在系统性关联。此外,言语可听度的改善与对助听器放大特性(适配)的总体满意度无关。然而,言语可听度的改善与助听器使用依从性有关,可听度较好的患者报告称他们更频繁地使用助听器。