Suppr超能文献

前膈神经磁刺激:实验室与临床评估

Anterior magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation: laboratory and clinical evaluation.

作者信息

Polkey M I, Duguet A, Luo Y, Hughes P D, Hart N, Hamnegård C H, Green M, Similowski T, Moxham J

机构信息

Respiratory Muscle Laboratory, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2000 Aug;26(8):1065-75. doi: 10.1007/s001340051319.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Anterior magnetic stimulation (aMS) of the phrenic nerves is a new method for the assessment of diaphragm contractility that might have particular applications for the clinical assessment of critically ill patients who are commonly supine.

DESIGN

We compared aMS with existing techniques for measurement of diaphragm weakness and fatigue in 10 normal subjects, 27 ambulant patients with suspected diaphragm weakness and 10 critically ill patients.

SETTING

Laboratory and intensive care unit of two university hospitals.

RESULTS

Although aMS was not demonstrably supramaximal in normal subjects, the mean value of twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure (Tw Pdi) obtained at 100% of stimulator output, 23.7 cmH2O, did not differ significantly from that obtained with bilateral supramaximal electrical stimulation (ES), 24.9 cmH2O, or bilateral anterior magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (BAMPS), 27.3 cmH2O. A fatiguing protocol produced a 20 % fall in aMS-Tw Pdi and a 19% fall in BAMPS-Tw Pdi; the fall in aMS-Tw Pdi correlated with the fall in BAMPS-Tw Pdi (r2 = 0.84, p = 0.03) indicating that aMS can detect diaphragm fatigue. In ambulant patients aMS agreed closely with existing measures of diaphragm strength. The maximal sniff Pdi correlated with both the aMS-Tw Pdi (r2 = 0.60, p < 0.0001) and the BAMPS-Tw Pdi (r2 = 0.65, p < 0.0001) and the aMS-Tw Pdi was a mean (SD) 2.2 (4.3) cmH2O less than BAMPS-Tw Pdi. In addition, aMS correctly identified diaphragm dysfunction in patients studied on the ICU.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that aMS is of clinical value for the investigation of suspected diaphragm weakness.

摘要

目的

膈神经前磁刺激(aMS)是一种评估膈肌收缩力的新方法,可能在临床上对通常仰卧的危重症患者的评估有特殊应用。

设计

我们在10名正常受试者、27名疑似膈肌无力的门诊患者和10名危重症患者中,将aMS与现有的测量膈肌无力和疲劳的技术进行了比较。

地点

两家大学医院的实验室和重症监护病房。

结果

虽然在正常受试者中aMS并非明显达到超强刺激,但在刺激器输出100%时获得的单次经膈压(Tw Pdi)平均值为23.7 cmH₂O,与双侧超强电刺激(ES)获得的24.9 cmH₂O或双侧膈神经前磁刺激(BAMPS)获得的27.3 cmH₂O相比,差异无统计学意义。疲劳方案使aMS-Tw Pdi下降20%,BAMPS-Tw Pdi下降19%;aMS-Tw Pdi的下降与BAMPS-Tw Pdi的下降相关(r² = 0.84,p = 0.03),表明aMS可检测膈肌疲劳。在门诊患者中,aMS与现有的膈肌力量测量方法密切相关。最大吸气Pdi与aMS-Tw Pdi(r² = 0.60,p < 0.0001)和BAMPS-Tw Pdi(r² = 0.65,p < 0.0001)均相关,且aMS-Tw Pdi比BAMPS-Tw Pdi平均(标准差)低2.2(4.3)cmH₂O。此外,aMS正确识别了在重症监护病房研究的患者的膈肌功能障碍。

结论

我们得出结论,aMS对疑似膈肌无力的调查具有临床价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验