Suppr超能文献

带状疱疹的抗病毒治疗:50岁及以上免疫功能正常患者使用伐昔洛韦和泛昔洛韦治疗的随机对照临床试验

Antiviral therapy for herpes zoster: randomized, controlled clinical trial of valacyclovir and famciclovir therapy in immunocompetent patients 50 years and older.

作者信息

Tyring S K, Beutner K R, Tucker B A, Anderson W C, Crooks R J

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.

出版信息

Arch Fam Med. 2000 Sep-Oct;9(9):863-9. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.9.863.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of valacyclovir hydrochloride and famciclovir for the treatment of herpes zoster.

DESIGN

A double-blind, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial in which patients received 7 days of treatment and were followed up for 24 weeks.

SETTINGS

Patients reported directly to specialist centers or were referred from primary care centers.

PATIENTS

There were 597 otherwise healthy immunocompetent outpatients, aged 50 years and older, who presented within 72 hours of onset of zoster rash.

INTERVENTIONS

Treatment with valacyclovir hydrochloride (1 g 3 times daily) or famciclovir (500 mg 3 times daily) for 7 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Resolution of zoster-associated pain and postherpetic neuralgia, rash healing, and treatment safety.

RESULTS

Intent-to-treat analysis did not detect statistically significant differences for valacyclovir vs famciclovir on resolution of zoster-associated pain (hazard ratio, 1. 02; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.23; P =.84). Furthermore, no differences were evident between treatments on rash healing rates and on a range of analyses of postherpetic neuralgia. Safety profiles for valacyclovir and famciclovir were similar, with headache and nausea being the more common adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Valacyclovir treatment is comparable to famciclovir treatment in speeding the resolution of zoster-associated pain and postherpetic neuralgia. Current wholesale prices indicate that valacyclovir is the more cost-effective treatment for herpes zoster ($83.90 vs $140.70 per course).

摘要

目的

比较盐酸伐昔洛韦和泛昔洛韦治疗带状疱疹的疗效与安全性。

设计

一项双盲、随机、对照、多中心临床试验,患者接受7天治疗,并随访24周。

地点

患者直接向专科中心报告或由初级保健中心转诊。

患者

597名年龄在50岁及以上、免疫功能正常的健康门诊患者,在带状疱疹皮疹出现后72小时内就诊。

干预措施

用盐酸伐昔洛韦(每日3次,每次1g)或泛昔洛韦(每日3次,每次500mg)治疗7天。

主要观察指标

带状疱疹相关疼痛和带状疱疹后神经痛的缓解情况、皮疹愈合情况及治疗安全性。

结果

意向性分析未发现盐酸伐昔洛韦与泛昔洛韦在缓解带状疱疹相关疼痛方面存在统计学显著差异(风险比为1.02;95%置信区间为0.84 - 1.23;P = 0.84)。此外,两种治疗方法在皮疹愈合率及一系列带状疱疹后神经痛分析方面均无明显差异。盐酸伐昔洛韦和泛昔洛韦的安全性相似,头痛和恶心是较常见的不良事件。

结论

在加速带状疱疹相关疼痛和带状疱疹后神经痛的缓解方面,盐酸伐昔洛韦治疗与泛昔洛韦治疗相当。目前的批发价格表明,盐酸伐昔洛韦是治疗带状疱疹更具成本效益的药物(每疗程83.90美元对140.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验