• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阳光照射带来的眼部风险。

Ocular risks from sunlight exposure.

作者信息

Garber N

机构信息

Productivity Enhancement Group, Inc., Sarasota, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol. 2000 Jan-Feb;19(1):13-21; quiz 22-5.

PMID:11033664
Abstract

Relinquishing the desire to acquire a tan will be difficult for many people. To many individuals, a tan is a symbol of health, fashion and attractiveness. Even when informed about the risks of sunlight exposure, many people ignore the advice to change their behaviors and decrease their risks. Adoption of safe sunlight precautions depends on individual preference, age, work requirements, gender, and perception of personal risk. Many people selectively adhere to certain protective behaviors which do not conflict with social norms. Reinforcement of how sunlight can damage the eyes and skin needs to be continually provided so that public attitudes can adapt to all the necessary appropriate behaviors. Ophthalmic health care professionals have an important part in public education. They can customize their patient's personal protective requirements to match the type of risks uncovered in the clinical work up. The ocular and social history should include the patient's sunlight exposure risk profile and document pre-existing sunlight damage to the eyes and facial areas. All follow-up visits should reinforce sunlight exposure information and document compliance or non-compliance. Only in this way can the eye care delivery system support preventative measures to decrease ocular injuries from sunlight radiation.

摘要

对许多人来说,放弃晒黑的欲望会很困难。对许多人而言,晒黑是健康、时尚和魅力的象征。即使被告知阳光照射的风险,许多人还是会忽视改变行为以降低风险的建议。采取安全的阳光防护措施取决于个人偏好、年龄、工作要求、性别以及对个人风险的认知。许多人会有选择地坚持某些不与社会规范冲突的保护行为。需要持续强调阳光如何损害眼睛和皮肤,以便公众态度能适应所有必要的适当行为。眼科保健专业人员在公众教育中起着重要作用。他们可以根据临床检查中发现的风险类型,为患者定制个人防护要求。眼部和社会病史应包括患者的阳光照射风险概况,并记录眼睛和面部先前存在的阳光损伤情况。所有随访都应强化阳光照射信息,并记录是否遵守规定。只有这样,眼科护理服务系统才能支持预防措施,以减少阳光辐射造成的眼部损伤。

相似文献

1
Ocular risks from sunlight exposure.阳光照射带来的眼部风险。
J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol. 2000 Jan-Feb;19(1):13-21; quiz 22-5.
2
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
3
An epidemiological perspective of ultraviolet exposure--public health concerns.紫外线照射的流行病学视角——公共卫生关注点。
Eye Contact Lens. 2011 Jul;37(4):168-75. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31821cb0cf.
4
Ocular exposure to UV-B in sunlight: the Melbourne visual impairment project model.眼部暴露于阳光中的紫外线B:墨尔本视力损害项目模型
Bull World Health Organ. 1996;74(4):353-60.
5
Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.在发生放射性袭击时保护人们免受辐射照射。国际放射防护委员会的一份报告。
Ann ICRP. 2005;35(1):1-110, iii-iv. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2005.01.001.
6
Sun and the eye: prevention and detection of light-induced disease.阳光与眼睛:光诱导疾病的预防与检测
Clin Dermatol. 1998 Jul-Aug;16(4):477-85. doi: 10.1016/s0738-081x(98)00021-2.
7
The challenge resulting from positive and negative effects of sunlight: how much solar UV exposure is appropriate to balance between risks of vitamin D deficiency and skin cancer?阳光正负效应带来的挑战:多少太阳紫外线照射量才适合在维生素D缺乏风险和皮肤癌风险之间取得平衡?
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2006 Sep;92(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.02.010. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
8
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
10
[Effects of optical radiation in ocular structures].[光辐射对眼部结构的影响]
Oftalmologia. 2007;51(3):23-40.