Suppr超能文献

在患有急性哮喘的成人中,将静脉注射氨茶碱添加到β2激动剂中。

Addition of intravenous aminophylline to beta2-agonists in adults with acute asthma.

作者信息

Parameswaran K, Belda J, Rowe B H

机构信息

St. Joseph's Hospital-McMaster University, 50 Charlton Ave East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4A6.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD002742. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002742.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aminophylline has been used extensively in acute asthma, but its role is unclear especially with respect to any additional benefit when added to beta2-agonists.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the magnitude of effect of the addition of intravenous aminophylline to beta2-agonists in adult patients with acute asthma treated in the emergency setting.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were identified from the following sources: The Cochrane Airways Group register (derived from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL standardised searches), hand searched respiratory journals and meeting abstracts. Potentially relevant articles were obtained, and their bibliographic lists were hand searched for additional articles. The search included searches of the database up to 1999.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing intravenous aminophylline versus placebo in adults with acute asthma and treated with beta-adrenergic agonists. Patients could be treated with or without corticosteroids or other bronchodilators.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A total of 210 abstracts were identified. Two independent reviewers selected a total of 27 eligible studies for possible inclusion, in which quality assessment was performed and a third reviewer was used to adjudicate disagreements. Peak expiratory flow (PEFR) and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) data were extracted and entered in Review Manager from these studies. Information not obtained from the authors was estimated from graphs. All data were entered and double checked by two reviewers. Results are reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) or odds ratio (OR), both with 95% confidential intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen trials were included. Overall, the quality of the studies was only moderate; concealment of allocation was assessed as clearly adequate in only seven (45%) of the trials. The doses of aminophylline and other medications and the severity of asthma varied between studies. There was no statistically significant effect of aminophylline on airflow outcomes at any time period. The aminophylline treated group had higher values of PEFR at 12 (PEFR 8 L/min or 2.3%) and 24 hours (PEFR 22 L/min or 6.4%), but these were not significant (p>0.05). Two subgroup analyses were performed by grouping studies according to mean baseline airflow limitation (n = 11 studies) and the use of any steroids (n = 9 studies). There was no relationship between baseline airflow limitation nor the use of steroids on the effect of aminophylline. Aminophylline treated patients reported more palpitations/arrhythmias (OR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.5 to 5.7) and vomiting (OR: 4.2; 95% CI 2.4 to 7.4), but no difference was found in tremor or hospital admissions.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: In acute asthma, the use of intravenous aminophylline did not result in any additional bronchodilation compared to standard care with beta-agonists. The frequency of adverse effects was higher with aminophylline. No subgroups in which aminophylline might be more effective could be identified. These results should be added to consensus statements and guidelines.

摘要

背景

氨茶碱已广泛应用于急性哮喘治疗,但其作用尚不清楚,尤其是在与β2受体激动剂联用时是否具有额外益处。

目的

确定在急诊环境中接受治疗的成年急性哮喘患者,静脉使用氨茶碱联合β2受体激动剂的疗效大小。

检索策略

从以下来源识别研究:Cochrane气道组注册库(源自MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL标准化检索),手工检索呼吸领域期刊和会议摘要。获取潜在相关文章,并手工检索其参考文献列表以查找其他文章。检索涵盖截至1999年的数据库。

入选标准

比较静脉使用氨茶碱与安慰剂治疗成年急性哮喘且联用β-肾上腺素能激动剂的随机对照试验。患者可接受或不接受皮质类固醇或其他支气管扩张剂治疗。

数据收集与分析

共识别出210篇摘要。两名独立评审员共选择了27项符合条件的研究可能纳入,对其进行质量评估,第三名评审员用于裁决分歧。从这些研究中提取第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)和呼气峰值流速(PEFR)数据,并录入Review Manager。未从作者处获得的信息根据图表估算。所有数据由两名评审员录入并复查。结果以加权平均差(WMD)或比值比(OR)报告,均带有95%置信区间(CI)。

主要结果

纳入15项试验。总体而言,研究质量仅为中等;仅7项(45%)试验的分配隐藏情况被评估为明显充分。各研究中氨茶碱及其他药物剂量以及哮喘严重程度各不相同。氨茶碱在任何时间段对气流指标均无统计学显著影响。氨茶碱治疗组在12小时(PEFR 8升/分钟或2.3%)和24小时(PEFR 22升/分钟或6.4%)时的PEFR值较高,但差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。根据平均基线气流受限情况(n = 11项研究)和是否使用任何类固醇(n = 9项研究)对研究进行分组,进行了两项亚组分析。基线气流受限情况和类固醇使用情况与氨茶碱的疗效均无关联。氨茶碱治疗的患者报告有更多心悸/心律失常(OR:2.9;95%CI:1.5至5.7)和呕吐(OR:4.2;95%CI 2.4至7.4),但在震颤或住院方面未发现差异。

评审结论

在急性哮喘中,与β受体激动剂标准治疗相比,静脉使用氨茶碱未带来任何额外的支气管扩张作用。氨茶碱的不良反应发生率更高。未发现氨茶碱可能更有效的亚组。这些结果应补充到共识声明和指南中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验