Suppr超能文献

选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类及杂环类抗抑郁药:药物依从性比较

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic and heterocyclic antidepressants: comparison of drug adherence.

作者信息

Barbui C, Hotopf M, Freemantle N, Boynton J, Churchill R, Eccles M P, Geddes J R, Hardy R, Lewis G, Mason J M

机构信息

Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, UK, SE5 8AF.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD002791. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002791.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are thought to have better discontinuation rates (i.e. less people dropping out) than tricyclic and heterocyclic antidepressant drugs. It is important to quantify the drop-out rates of different antidepressant drugs in order to have a better understanding of the relative tolerability of these drugs.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic/heterocyclic antidepressant drugs.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Registers (1997 to 1999), MEDLINE (1966 to 1999), EMBASE (1974 to 1999) We also searched specialist journals, the reference lists of relevant papers and previous systematic reviews, conference abstracts and government documents. Representatives of the pharmaceutical industry were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Parallel group randomised controlled trials comparing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with tricyclic or heterocyclic antidepressants in people with depression.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and a third reviewer checked any cases of disagreement.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 136 trials. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors showed less participants dropping out compared to the tricyclic/heterocyclic group (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.30). A statistically significant difference was found in total drop-outs between the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the old tricyclics as well as the newer tricyclics. When the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were compared to the heterocyclic antidepressants, there was a non significant difference favouring the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The poor tolerability profile of the old tricyclics was explained by differences in drop-outs for side-effects, but not for inefficacy.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Whilst selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors do appear to show an advantage over tricyclic drugs in terms of total drop-outs, this advantage is relatively modest. This has implications for pharmaco-economic models, some of which may have overestimated the difference of drop-out rates between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antdepressants. These results are based on short-term randomised controlled trials, and may not generalise into clinical practice.

摘要

背景

人们认为选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂的停药率(即退出研究的人数较少)优于三环和四环抗抑郁药。为了更好地了解这些药物的相对耐受性,对不同抗抑郁药的退出率进行量化很重要。

目的

评估选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环/四环抗抑郁药的相对耐受性。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane协作组抑郁、焦虑和神经症对照试验注册库(1997年至1999年)、MEDLINE(1966年至1999年)、EMBASE(1974年至1999年)。我们还检索了专业期刊、相关论文的参考文献列表以及以往的系统评价、会议摘要和政府文件。我们联系了制药行业的代表。

选择标准

比较选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环或四环抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症患者的平行组随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两名评价者独立提取数据,第三名评价者检查意见不一致的情况。

主要结果

我们纳入了136项试验。与三环/四环组相比,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂组退出研究的参与者较少(比值比1.21,95%可信区间1.12至1.30)。在选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与老三环类药物以及新三环类药物之间,总退出率存在统计学显著差异。当将选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与四环抗抑郁药进行比较时,虽有利于选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂,但差异无统计学意义。老三环类药物耐受性差是由副作用导致的退出差异造成的,而非无效。

评价者结论

虽然选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在总退出率方面似乎比三环类药物有优势,但这种优势相对较小。这对药物经济学模型有影响,其中一些模型可能高估了选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与三环类抗抑郁药之间退出率的差异。这些结果基于短期随机对照试验,可能无法推广到临床实践中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验