• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健中的福利金咨询:健康改善的证据。

Welfare benefits advice in primary care: evidence of improvements in health.

作者信息

Abbott S, Hobby L

机构信息

Health and Community Care Research Unit, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GB.

出版信息

Public Health. 2000 Sep;114(5):324-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900680.

DOI:10.1038/sj.ph.1900680
PMID:11035449
Abstract

It is not uncommon for welfare benefits advice organisations to offer services in primary care settings. Given the link between deprivation and poor health, the maximising of individual income in this way may also be expected to improve health. However, such improvement has hitherto not been successfully measured. This paper reports on a small study of such a service, provided by the local Citizens Advice Bureau. Statistically significant increases in SF-36 scores were measured for those whose income increased as a result of receiving advice, despite the prevalence in the group (average age 56 y) of chronic disabling conditions such as arthritis and sensory impairment. These findings suggest that 'prescribing advice' is a health intervention which is appropriately situated in primary care.

摘要

福利咨询组织在初级医疗保健机构提供服务的情况并不少见。鉴于贫困与健康状况不佳之间的联系,通过这种方式使个人收入最大化也有望改善健康状况。然而,迄今为止尚未成功衡量到这种改善。本文报告了一项关于当地公民咨询局提供的此类服务的小型研究。对于那些因接受咨询而收入增加的人,SF-36评分有统计学上的显著提高,尽管该组(平均年龄56岁)普遍存在关节炎和感觉障碍等慢性致残疾病。这些发现表明,“开处方式建议”是一种适合在初级医疗保健中进行的健康干预措施。

相似文献

1
Welfare benefits advice in primary care: evidence of improvements in health.初级保健中的福利金咨询:健康改善的证据。
Public Health. 2000 Sep;114(5):324-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900680.
2
What is the impact on individual health of services in general practice settings which offer welfare benefits advice?在提供福利金建议的全科医疗环境中,各项服务对个人健康有何影响?
Health Soc Care Community. 2006 Jan;14(1):1-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00582.x.
3
Who uses welfare benefits advice services in primary care?谁在初级医疗保健中使用福利津贴咨询服务?
Health Soc Care Community. 2003 Mar;11(2):168-74. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00414.x.
4
Does social cohesion modify the association between area income deprivation and mental health? A multilevel analysis.社会凝聚力是否会改变地区收入剥夺与心理健康之间的关联?一项多层次分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Apr;36(2):338-45. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym004. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
5
The Do-Well study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial, economic and qualitative process evaluations of domiciliary welfare rights advice for socio-economically disadvantaged older people recruited via primary health care.《表现良好研究》:一项随机对照试验方案,对通过初级医疗保健招募的社会经济弱势老年人进行家庭福利权利咨询的经济和定性过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2012 May 28;12:382. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-382.
6
Disabled workers and the indexing of Social Security benefits.残疾工人与社会保障福利指数化
Soc Secur Bull. 2007;67(4):21-50.
7
Using the Health Assessment Questionnaire and welfare benefits advice to help people disabled through arthritis to access financial support.使用健康评估问卷和福利津贴建议,帮助因关节炎致残的人获得经济支持。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jul;43(7):863-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh184. Epub 2004 Apr 27.
8
Heat or eat: the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program and nutritional and health risks among children less than 3 years of age.取暖还是吃饭:低收入家庭能源援助计划与3岁以下儿童的营养和健康风险
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1293-302. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2943.
9
Variation in use and costs of primary health and social services in mental health or drinking problems.心理健康或饮酒问题方面初级卫生和社会服务的使用及成本差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2009 Jun;12(2):79-86.
10
Enhancing smoking cessation of low-income smokers in managed care.在管理式医疗中提高低收入吸烟者的戒烟率。
J Fam Pract. 2001 Feb;50(2):138-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Embedding work coaches in GP practices: Findings from an interview-based study in the UK.将工作教练融入全科医生诊所:英国一项基于访谈的研究结果
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Sep 12;8:100548. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100548. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
PROTOCOL: A comprehensive review of prioritized interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of persons with lived experience of homelessness.方案:对优先干预措施进行全面审查,以改善有过无家可归经历者的健康和福祉。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 12;15(3):e1048. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1048. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
A comprehensive review of prioritised interventions to improve the health and wellbeing of persons with lived experience of homelessness.
对改善有过无家可归经历者的健康和福祉的优先干预措施的全面综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 24;17(2):e1154. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1154. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
A participatory evaluation of legal support in the context of health-focused peer advocacy with people who are homeless in London, UK.在英国伦敦,针对无家可归者的以健康为重点的同伴倡导背景下的法律支持的参与式评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e6622-e6630. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14111. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
5
The relationship between patients' income and education and their access to pharmacological chronic pain management: A scoping review.患者的收入和教育水平与其获得慢性疼痛药物治疗的关系:一项范围综述。
Can J Pain. 2022 Sep 1;6(1):142-170. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2104699. eCollection 2022.
6
How do income changes impact on mental health and wellbeing for working-age adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.收入变化如何影响劳动年龄段成年人的心理健康和幸福感?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Jun;7(6):e515-e528. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00058-5.
7
Effectiveness of community interventions for protecting and promoting the mental health of working-age adults experiencing financial uncertainty: a systematic review.针对面临经济不确定性的工作年龄成年人开展的社区心理健康保护与促进干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Jul;75(7):665-673. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-215574. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
8
Does domiciliary welfare rights advice improve health-related quality of life in independent-living, socio-economically disadvantaged people aged ≥60 years? Randomised controlled trial, economic and process evaluations in the North East of England.居家福利权益咨询是否能提高独立生活、社会经济地位处于劣势的≥60 岁人群的健康相关生活质量?英格兰东北部的一项随机对照试验、经济和过程评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0209560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209560. eCollection 2019.
9
A novel income security intervention to address poverty in a primary care setting: a retrospective chart review.一项在基层医疗环境中解决贫困问题的新型收入保障干预措施:回顾性病历审查。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 17;7(8):e014270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014270.
10
The Do-Well study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial, economic and qualitative process evaluations of domiciliary welfare rights advice for socio-economically disadvantaged older people recruited via primary health care.《表现良好研究》:一项随机对照试验方案,对通过初级医疗保健招募的社会经济弱势老年人进行家庭福利权利咨询的经济和定性过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2012 May 28;12:382. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-382.