• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过父母报告对年幼双胞胎进行合子性诊断。

Zygosity diagnosis in young twins by parental report.

作者信息

Rietveld M J, van Der Valk J C, Bongers I L, Stroet T M, Slagboom P E, Boomsma D I

机构信息

Vrije Universiteit, Department of Biological Psychology, Amsterdam.

出版信息

Twin Res. 2000 Sep;3(3):134-41. doi: 10.1375/136905200320565409.

DOI:10.1375/136905200320565409
PMID:11035485
Abstract

This study reports on zygosity determination in twins of childhood age. Parents responded to questionnaire items dealing with twin similarity in physical characteristics and frequency of mistaking one twin for another by parents, relatives and strangers. The accuracy of zygosity diagnosis was evaluated across twins aged 6, 8, and 10 and across parents. In addition, it was examined whether the use of multiple raters and the use of longitudinal data lead to an improvement of zygosity assignment. Complete data on zygosity questions and on genetic markers or blood profiles were available for 618 twin pairs at the age of 6 years. The method used was predictive discriminant analyses. Agreement between zygosity assigned by the replies to the questions and zygosity determined by DNA markers/blood typing was around 93%. The accuracy of assignment remained constant across age and parents. Analyses of data provided by both parents and collected over multiple ages did not result in better prediction of zygosity. Details on the discriminant function are provided.

摘要

本研究报告了儿童期双胞胎的合子性判定情况。父母们对问卷项目做出了回应,这些项目涉及双胞胎在身体特征上的相似性以及父母、亲属和陌生人将一个双胞胎误认成另一个的频率。对6岁、8岁和10岁的双胞胎以及他们的父母进行了合子性诊断准确性的评估。此外,还研究了使用多个评估者以及使用纵向数据是否会提高合子性判定的准确性。在6岁时,有618对双胞胎对合子性问题以及基因标记或血型数据完整。所采用的方法是预测判别分析。通过对问题的回答所确定的合子性与通过DNA标记/血型确定的合子性之间的一致性约为93%。合子性判定的准确性在不同年龄和父母群体中保持不变。对父母双方提供的、在多个年龄段收集的数据进行分析,并没有带来更好的合子性预测效果。文中提供了判别函数的详细信息。

相似文献

1
Zygosity diagnosis in young twins by parental report.通过父母报告对年幼双胞胎进行合子性诊断。
Twin Res. 2000 Sep;3(3):134-41. doi: 10.1375/136905200320565409.
2
Infant zygosity can be assigned by parental report questionnaire data.婴儿的合子性可通过父母报告问卷数据来确定。
Twin Res. 2000 Sep;3(3):129-33. doi: 10.1375/136905200320565391.
3
Diagnosis of zygosity by questionnaire and polymarker polymerase chain reaction in young twins.通过问卷调查和多标记聚合酶链反应诊断年轻双胞胎的合子性
Behav Genet. 1999 Mar;29(2):115-23. doi: 10.1023/a:1021660506222.
4
Zygosity diagnosis in young twins by questionnaire for twins' mothers and twins' self-reports.通过向双胞胎母亲发放问卷以及双胞胎自我报告来诊断年幼双胞胎的合子性。
Twin Res. 2004 Feb;7(1):5-12. doi: 10.1375/13690520460741381.
5
Determination of zygosity by questionnaire and physical features comparison in Chinese adult twins.通过问卷和身体特征比较确定中国成年双胞胎的合子性
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006 Apr;9(2):266-71. doi: 10.1375/183242706776382446.
6
Determination of twin zygosity: a comparison of DNA with various questionnaire indices.双胞胎合子性的确定:DNA与各种问卷指标的比较。
Twin Res. 2001 Feb;4(1):12-8. doi: 10.1375/1369052012092.
7
The determination of twin zygosity by means of a mailed questionnaire.通过邮寄问卷确定双胞胎的合子性
Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1979;28(3):225-36. doi: 10.1017/s0001566000009077.
8
Why Accurate Knowledge of Zygosity is Important to Twins.为什么准确了解合子性对双胞胎很重要。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2015 Jun;18(3):298-305. doi: 10.1017/thg.2015.15. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
9
Determining zygosity in the Vietnam era twin registry: an update.越南时代双胞胎登记处中合子性的判定:最新情况
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2010 Oct;13(5):461-4. doi: 10.1375/twin.13.5.461.
10
Definitive Zygosity Scores in the Peas in the Pod Questionnaire is a Sensitive and Accurate Assessment of the Zygosity of Adult Twins.《豆荚中的豌豆问卷》中的确定合子性评分是对成年双胞胎合子性的敏感且准确的评估。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2018 Apr;21(2):146-154. doi: 10.1017/thg.2018.9.

引用本文的文献

1
Heritability of children's Secure Base Script Knowledge in middle childhood: a twin study with the Attachment Script Assessment.童年中期儿童安全基地脚本知识的遗传力:一项使用依恋脚本评估的双胞胎研究。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;66(6):796-804. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14089. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
2
Iranian school-aged twin registry: preliminary reports and project progress.伊朗学龄双胞胎登记处:初步报告和项目进展。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Feb 10;23(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-03865-x.
3
Actigraphic sleep and cortisol in middle childhood: A multivariate behavioral genetics model.
童年中期的活动记录仪睡眠与皮质醇:多变量行为遗传学模型
Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2021 Oct 14;8:100094. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2021.100094. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
Persistence of parental-reported asthma at early ages: A longitudinal twin study.父母报告的幼儿哮喘持续存在:一项纵向双胞胎研究。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022 Mar;33(3):e13762. doi: 10.1111/pai.13762.
5
Genetic Influences on the Covariance and Genetic Correlations in a Bivariate Twin Model: An Application to Well-Being.双变量双胞胎模型中协方差和遗传相关性的遗传影响:幸福感的应用。
Behav Genet. 2021 May;51(3):191-203. doi: 10.1007/s10519-021-10046-y. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
6
Heritability of overlapping impulsivity and compulsivity dimensional phenotypes.重叠冲动性和强迫性维度表型的遗传性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 1;10(1):14378. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71013-x.
7
Genetic and environmental influences on structure of the social brain in childhood.遗传和环境因素对儿童社会大脑结构的影响。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Aug;44:100782. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100782. Epub 2020 May 5.
8
How Heritable are Parental Sensitivity and Limit-Setting? A Longitudinal Child-Based Twin Study on Observed Parenting.父母敏感性和限制设置的遗传性如何?基于观察的育儿纵向儿童双胞胎研究。
Child Dev. 2020 Nov;91(6):2255-2269. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13365. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
9
Investigating the association between family connectedness and self-control in adolescence in a genetically sensitive design.在遗传敏感设计中研究青少年家庭联系与自我控制之间的关系。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Dec;29(12):1683-1692. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01485-9. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
10
Genetic and Environmental Associations Between Child Personality and Parenting.儿童个性与养育方式之间的遗传和环境关联。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2019 Aug;10(6):711-721. doi: 10.1177/1948550618784890. Epub 2018 Jul 17.