Colosetti S D, Thyer B A
University of Georgia, USA.
Behav Modif. 2000 Oct;24(5):719-39. doi: 10.1177/0145445500245006.
Five women prisoners with a history of being battered and who met the DSM-IV criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder were assessed (A phase) and provided with structured relaxation training (RT) (B phase, or placebo treatment), followed by eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy (C phase). Using the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Impact of Events Scale's avoidance behavior and intrusive thoughts subscales as outcome measures, RT alone did not result in any clinical improvements. The subsequent provision of EMDR did not improve upon this lack of success with 4 of the 5 participants; 1 did improve on anxiety and intrusive thoughts. The apparent ineffectiveness of EMDR with these participants may be attributed to several explanations. Foremost perhaps is the hypothesis that EMDR is not sufficient to ameliorate the effects of chronic abuse.
对五名有受虐史且符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版创伤后应激障碍标准的女性囚犯进行了评估(A阶段),并为她们提供了结构化放松训练(RT)(B阶段,或安慰剂治疗),随后进行眼动脱敏再处理(EMDR)疗法(C阶段)。使用贝克焦虑量表以及事件影响量表的回避行为和侵入性思维分量表作为结果指标,单独的放松训练并未带来任何临床改善。随后对五名参与者中的四名进行的眼动脱敏再处理并没有改善这种未成功的情况;有一名参与者在焦虑和侵入性思维方面有所改善。眼动脱敏再处理对这些参与者明显无效可能有几种解释。也许最主要的假说是眼动脱敏再处理不足以改善长期虐待的影响。