Barben J U, Robertson C F, Robinson P J
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2000 Oct;36(5):491-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2000.00558.x.
Implementation of clinical guidelines is frequently delayed well beyond their dissemination and the publication of clinical evidence. The recently published Australian guidelines for the management of acute viral bronchiolitis (AVB) have been evaluated by assessing the current practice of Australian paediatricians.
Questionnaire survey of all Australian paediatricians and a review of the literature.
Of a total of 891 questionnaires, 555 (62%) were returned. Of the respondents, 373 (67%) treated children with AVB and, of these, 232 (67%) treated 10-50 children per year. A wide variation in management practice for both outpatient and inpatient treatment of AVB was identified. Up to 70% of paediatricians who treated AVB indicated using pharmaceutical agents in their outpatient management (88% in inpatient management), most using these agents 'sometimes' or in high-risk children. Paediatric respiratory physicians tended to use bronchodilators less frequently than general paediatricians. Compared with many countries in Europe, few Australian paediatricians routinely use supplementary drugs in the inpatient managenment of AVB; in particular, bronchodilators (61 vs 7%) and corticosteroids (11 vs 1%) are used far less often. A review of the literature demonstrated that pharmaceutical agents do not influence the course of AVB.
Despite a lack of evidence for their efficacy and the recommendation of the Australian guidelines, pharmaceutical agents are frequently used in the management of AVB by paediatricians in Australia, although far less than reported in a recently published European survey. Guidelines alone are not sufficient to implement change and there is a need for more specific strategies to ensure that children receive appropriate management for this common condition.
临床指南的实施常常远远滞后于其传播以及临床证据的发表。通过评估澳大利亚儿科医生的当前实践,对最近发布的澳大利亚急性病毒性细支气管炎(AVB)管理指南进行了评价。
对所有澳大利亚儿科医生进行问卷调查并进行文献综述。
在总共891份问卷中,有555份(62%)被返回。在受访者中,373名(67%)治疗过AVB患儿,其中232名(67%)每年治疗10 - 50名患儿。发现AVB门诊和住院治疗的管理实践存在很大差异。治疗AVB的儿科医生中,高达70%表示在门诊管理中使用药物(住院管理中为88%),大多数是“有时”使用这些药物或用于高危患儿。儿科呼吸科医生使用支气管扩张剂的频率往往低于普通儿科医生。与欧洲许多国家相比,很少有澳大利亚儿科医生在AVB住院管理中常规使用辅助药物;特别是,支气管扩张剂(61%对7%)和皮质类固醇(11%对1%)的使用频率要低得多。文献综述表明,药物对AVB的病程没有影响。
尽管缺乏疗效证据且澳大利亚指南有相关建议,但澳大利亚儿科医生在AVB管理中仍经常使用药物,不过远低于最近发表的一项欧洲调查中的报告。仅靠指南不足以实现变革,需要更具体的策略来确保儿童在这种常见病症中得到适当管理。