Pilleul F, Merchant N
Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto General Hospital, Ontario, Canada.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000 Sep-Oct;24(5):683-7. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200009000-00003.
The purpose was to determine the ability of three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography to depict normal pulmonary veins in comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
MR imaging of 40 patients with cardiovascular disease were reviewed. Patients with known pulmonary venous abnormalities were excluded. Using a standard GE 1.5-T magnet, axial T1-weighted spin-echo 5-mm-thick contiguous slices and 3D MR angiography (contiguous slice thickness of 2.5-3.5 mm, 20-30 c.c. of gadolinium bolus at 1-1.5 c.c./sec, 32-43-second breath-hold, coronal and sagittal plane acquisition) were evaluated retrospectively on separate occasions by two experienced radiologists. Multiplanar imaging projection was used for the identification of pulmonary veins. Each lung was considered to have two drainage veins: a superior vein and an inferior vein. Identification of a pulmonary vein was made by visualizing a connection with the left atrium.
143 pulmonary veins (87.5% +/-5.2) were identified at the level of the left atrium on T1-weighted spin-echo images, and 157 (98.1% +/-1.9) were identified on 3D MR angiography (p<0.01). Overall we identified by T -weighted spin-echo imaging 36 right upper, 38 right lower, 27 left upper, and 38 left lower pulmonary veins. By 3D MR angiography, we identified 38 right upper, 40 right lower, 39 left upper, and 40 left lower pulmonary veins. All four pulmonary veins were detected in 22 patients on spin-echo imaging (55%) and in 37 patients (92.5%) on 3D MR angiography (chi = 3.81, p<0.05).
A significant difference is demonstrated between 3D MR angiography and spin-echo MR imaging in identifying normal pulmonary veins. MR angiography provides a complete view of normal pulmonary venous anatomy and could be a valuable tool for the assessment of abnormal pulmonary venous drainage.
旨在确定三维(3D)磁共振(MR)血管造影与自旋回波MR成像相比描绘正常肺静脉的能力。
回顾性分析40例心血管疾病患者的MR成像资料。排除已知肺静脉异常的患者。使用标准的GE 1.5-T磁体,由两名经验丰富的放射科医生分别在不同时间对轴向T1加权自旋回波5毫米厚的连续层面以及3D MR血管造影(连续层面厚度为2.5 - 3.5毫米,钆团注20 - 30毫升,注射速度为1 - 1.5毫升/秒,屏气32 - 43秒,冠状面和矢状面采集)进行回顾性评估。采用多平面成像投影来识别肺静脉。每个肺被认为有两条引流静脉:一条上静脉和一条下静脉。通过观察与左心房的连接来识别肺静脉。
在T1加权自旋回波图像上,于左心房水平识别出143条肺静脉(87.5%±5.2),在3D MR血管造影上识别出157条(98.1%±1.9)(p<0.01)。总体而言,通过T加权自旋回波成像我们识别出右上肺静脉36条、右下肺静脉38条、左上肺静脉27条和左下肺静脉38条。通过3D MR血管造影,我们识别出右上肺静脉38条、右下肺静脉40条、左上肺静脉39条和左下肺静脉40条。在自旋回波成像中,22例患者(55%)检测到所有四条肺静脉,在3D MR血管造影中,37例患者(92.5%)检测到所有四条肺静脉(卡方值 = 3.81,p<0.05)。
3D MR血管造影与自旋回波MR成像在识别正常肺静脉方面存在显著差异。MR血管造影可提供正常肺静脉解剖结构的完整视图,可能是评估异常肺静脉引流的有价值工具。