Micheletti L, Preti M, Bocci C, Bogliatto F, Condello V, Chieppa P
Cattedra A del Dipartimento di Discipline Ginecologiche ed Ostetriche, Università degli Studi, Torino.
Minerva Ginecol. 2000 May;52(5):197-201.
Human papillomavirus subclinical lesions are well known on the cervix and are identified by colposcopy after acetic acid staining. The transfer of this technique from the cervix to the vulva has led to the identification of areas of white epithelial changes which have been defined by similarity as vulvar subclinical HPV (VSHPV) lesions. A critical revision of the different clinical VSHPV lesions classifications, the vulvar diagnostic role of acetic acid staining, the natural history of HPV infection and the histological-biomolecular diagnostic techniques has the authors to the conclusions that the majority of the "so called" VSHPV lesions should not be considered a real disease. The presence of HPV-DNA in these subclinical lesions should be considered causal and not causal. To avoid overtreatments in women with proven HPV-DNA positivity without macroscopic clinical lesions, the authors recommend to abandon the acetic acid staining on the vulva and invite to consider the VSHPV lesions a faked diagnosis and not a clinical entity.
人乳头瘤病毒亚临床病变在宫颈上众所周知,通过醋酸染色后的阴道镜检查来识别。将该技术从宫颈转移到外阴后,已识别出白色上皮变化区域,这些区域通过相似性被定义为外阴亚临床人乳头瘤病毒(VSHPV)病变。对不同的临床VSHPV病变分类、醋酸染色在外阴的诊断作用、人乳头瘤病毒感染的自然史以及组织学 - 生物分子诊断技术进行批判性修订后,作者得出结论,大多数“所谓的”VSHPV病变不应被视为一种真正的疾病。这些亚临床病变中HPV - DNA的存在应被视为有因果关系和无因果关系。为避免对已证实HPV - DNA阳性但无宏观临床病变的女性进行过度治疗,作者建议放弃对外阴的醋酸染色,并建议将VSHPV病变视为一种虚假诊断而非临床实体。