Braun-Fahrländer C
Department of Environment and Health, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Basel, Switzerland.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2000;11 Suppl 13:19-22. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3038.2000.00505.x.
Several studies have reported lower rates of allergic sensitization and allergies in children living in rural as compared to urban communities. This has been attributed to the lower levels of air pollution in rural areas. The question arises whether other factors in the rural environment could explain the lower prevalence rates of allergic sensitization and hay fever. A first report from rural South Bavaria in Germany demonstrated that children living in a home where coal and wood were used for heating had a significantly lower risk of suffering from hay fever (odds ratio 0.57 (0.34-0.98)), of being sensitized to common allergens (OR 0.67 (0.49-0.93)) and of having bronchial hyperresponsiveness (OR 0.55 (0.34-0.90)) than their peers living in homes with other heating systems. Subsequently, the Swiss Study on Childhood Allergy and Respiratory Symptoms with Respect to Air Pollution (SCARPOL) tested the hypothesis that farming as parental occupation was associated with a lower risk of hay fever and atopy. A total of 1620 (86.0%) 6-15-year-old schoolchildren living in three rural communities of Switzerland were examined using a standardized questionnaire completed by the parents and IgE antibodies against six common aeroallergens in serum samples of 404 (69.3.0%) of the 13-15-year-olds. Farming as parental occupation was significantly associated with lower rates of reported hay fever symptoms and allergic sensitization. Comparing children from farming with those from non-farming environments, the adjusted OR was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.12-0.89) for sneezing attacks during the pollen season, and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.13-0.73) for a sensitization to allergens. These results have recently been confirmed in a new and much larger survey in rural South Bavaria. Several alternative explanations have to be considered when interpreting these findings, namely, selection bias, the development of tolerance, increased microbial stimulation and a more traditional lifestyle (diet and housing conditions). Based on present knowledge, the underlying environmental factor explaining the protective effect of the farming environment has not yet been identified.
几项研究报告称,与城市社区的儿童相比,农村儿童的过敏致敏和过敏发生率较低。这被归因于农村地区较低的空气污染水平。问题在于,农村环境中的其他因素是否可以解释过敏致敏和花粉热的较低患病率。德国巴伐利亚州南部农村的第一份报告表明,生活在使用煤炭和木材取暖的家庭中的儿童患花粉热的风险显著较低(优势比为0.57(0.34 - 0.98)),对常见过敏原致敏的风险较低(优势比为0.67(0.49 - 0.93)),以及支气管高反应性的风险较低(优势比为0.55(0.34 - 0.90)),与生活在使用其他供暖系统家庭中的同龄人相比。随后,瑞士关于儿童过敏和呼吸道症状与空气污染关系的研究(SCARPOL)检验了父母职业为务农与花粉热和特应性风险较低相关的假设。对居住在瑞士三个农村社区的1620名(86.0%)6至15岁学童进行了调查,由父母填写标准化问卷,并对404名(69.3%)13至15岁学童的血清样本检测了针对六种常见气传过敏原的IgE抗体。父母职业为务农与报告的花粉热症状和过敏致敏率较低显著相关。将务农家庭的儿童与非务农环境的儿童进行比较,在花粉季节打喷嚏发作的调整后优势比为0.34(95%置信区间:0.12 - 0.89),对过敏原致敏的调整后优势比为0.31(95%置信区间:0.13 - 0.73)。这些结果最近在巴伐利亚州南部农村一项新的、规模大得多的调查中得到了证实。在解释这些发现时,必须考虑几种其他解释,即选择偏倚、耐受性的发展、微生物刺激增加以及更传统的生活方式(饮食和住房条件)。基于目前的知识,尚未确定解释务农环境保护作用的潜在环境因素。