Chu Luan M, Rennie Donna C, Cockcroft Donald W, Pahwa P, Dosman J, Hagel L, Karunanayake C, Pickett William, Lawson Joshua A
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Canadian Center for Health and Safety in Agriculture, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 Oct;113(4):430-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
There have been few investigations of farming-related activities or specific characteristics resulting in the associations between those exposures and atopic disease.
To study the associations between farm-associated exposures and atopic diseases.
As part of a longitudinal study of lung health in rural residents, a cross-sectional baseline study was conducted in rural Saskatchewan, Canada. This included an initial survey phase followed by a clinical testing phase. A subsample of 584 children (grades 1-8) completed skin prick testing to assess atopic status. Atopy was defined as a positive reaction to any of 6 allergens (local grasses, wheat dust, cat dander, house dust mite, Alternaria species, or Cladosporium species) of at least 3 mm compared with the negative control.
Of those who completed clinical testing, the prevalence of atopy was 19.4%, that of hay fever was 8.8%, and that of eczema was 27.4%. Based on skin prick testing, sensitization was highest for cat dander (8.6%) followed by local grasses (8.2%) and house dust mite (5.1%). After adjustment for potential confounders, home location (farm vs non-farm) was not associated with atopic status. However, livestock farming was protective against atopy (adjusted odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.88). In contrast, current residence on a farm was associated with an increase in the likelihood of hay fever in these children (adjusted odds ratio 3.68, 95% confidence interval 1.29-10.45). Also, regular farming activities in the past year were associated with an increased risk of hay fever.
In children, livestock exposure has a protective effect on skin prick test positivity, whereas farm living and activities increase the risk of hay fever.
关于与农业相关的活动或特定特征导致这些暴露与特应性疾病之间关联的研究较少。
研究与农场相关的暴露因素与特应性疾病之间的关联。
作为农村居民肺部健康纵向研究的一部分,在加拿大萨斯喀彻温省农村进行了一项横断面基线研究。这包括初始调查阶段和临床测试阶段。584名1至8年级儿童的子样本完成了皮肤点刺试验以评估特应性状态。特应性定义为与阴性对照相比,对6种变应原(本地草、小麦粉尘、猫皮屑、屋尘螨、链格孢属或枝孢属)中任何一种至少3毫米的阳性反应。
在完成临床测试的人群中,特应性患病率为19.4%,花粉症患病率为8.8%,湿疹患病率为27.4%。根据皮肤点刺试验,对猫皮屑的致敏率最高(8.6%),其次是本地草(8.2%)和屋尘螨(5.1%)。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,家庭住址(农场与非农场)与特应性状态无关。然而,从事畜牧业对特应性有保护作用(调整后的优势比为0.38,95%置信区间为0.17 - 0.88)。相比之下,目前居住在农场与这些儿童花粉症患病可能性增加有关(调整后的优势比为3.68,95%置信区间为1.29 - 10.45)。此外,过去一年的常规农业活动与花粉症风险增加有关。
在儿童中,接触家畜对皮肤点刺试验阳性有保护作用,而农场生活和活动会增加花粉症风险。