Suppr超能文献

在视觉检测任务中无法处理多个内部表示。

Failure to handle more than one internal representation in visual detection tasks.

作者信息

Gorea A, Sagi D

机构信息

Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique & René Descartes University, 71 Ave. Edouard Vaillant, 92774 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):12380-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.22.12380.

Abstract

Perceptual studies make a clear distinction between sensitivity and decision criterion. The former is taken to characterize the processing efficiency of the underlying sensory system and it increases with stimulus strength. The latter is regarded as the manifestation of a subjective operation whereby individuals decide on (as opposed to react reflexively to) the occurrence of an event based on factors such as expectation and payoff, in addition to its strength. To do so, individuals need to have some knowledge of the internal response distributions evoked by this event or its absence. In a natural, behaviorally relevant multistimulus environment, observers must handle many such independent distributions to optimize their decision criteria. Here we show that they cannot do so. Instead, while leaving sensitivity unchanged, lower and higher visibility events tend to be reported respectively less and more frequently than when they are presented in isolation. This behavior is in quantitative agreement with predictions based on the notion that observers represent a multistimulus environment as a unitary internal distribution to which each stimulus contributes proportionally to its probability of occurrence. Perceptual phenomena such as blindsight, hemineglect, and extinction may be, at least in part, accounted for in such a way.

摘要

知觉研究明确区分了敏感性和决策标准。前者被认为是表征潜在感觉系统的处理效率,并且它会随着刺激强度的增加而提高。后者被视为一种主观操作的表现,即个体除了基于刺激强度外,还会根据期望和回报等因素来决定(而不是对事件的发生做出反射性反应)事件的发生。为此,个体需要对该事件或其未发生所引发的内部反应分布有所了解。在自然的、与行为相关的多刺激环境中,观察者必须处理许多这样独立的分布,以优化他们的决策标准。在这里,我们表明他们无法做到这一点。相反,在敏感性不变的情况下,与单独呈现时相比,较低和较高可见度的事件分别倾向于被报告得更少和更频繁。这种行为在数量上与基于以下概念的预测一致:观察者将多刺激环境表征为一个单一的内部分布,每个刺激按其发生概率成比例地对其做出贡献。诸如盲视、半侧空间忽视和消退等知觉现象至少部分可以用这种方式来解释。

相似文献

4
6
Challenging the fixed-criterion model of perceptual decision-making.挑战感知决策的固定标准模型。
Neurosci Conscious. 2023 Apr 20;2023(1):niad010. doi: 10.1093/nc/niad010. eCollection 2023.
10
Image-Computable Ideal Observers for Tasks with Natural Stimuli.用于自然刺激任务的图像可计算理想观察者
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2020 Sep 15;6:491-517. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-030320-041134. Epub 2020 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenging the Bayesian confidence hypothesis in perceptual decision-making.挑战贝叶斯置信度假设在知觉决策中的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Nov 26;121(48):e2410487121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2410487121. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
4
Challenging the fixed-criterion model of perceptual decision-making.挑战感知决策的固定标准模型。
Neurosci Conscious. 2023 Apr 20;2023(1):niad010. doi: 10.1093/nc/niad010. eCollection 2023.
5
Suprathreshold perceptual decisions constrain models of confidence.阈上感知决策约束了置信模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jul 27;18(7):e1010318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010318. eCollection 2022 Jul.
6
A robust confidence-accuracy dissociation via criterion attraction.通过标准吸引实现稳健的信心-准确性分离。
Neurosci Conscious. 2021 Nov 15;2021(1):niab039. doi: 10.1093/nc/niab039. eCollection 2021.
10
Suboptimality in perceptual decision making.感知决策中的次优性。
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Feb 27;41:e223. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18000936.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验