• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过标准吸引实现稳健的信心-准确性分离。

A robust confidence-accuracy dissociation via criterion attraction.

作者信息

Rahnev Dobromir

机构信息

School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 654 Cherry Str. NW, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.

出版信息

Neurosci Conscious. 2021 Nov 15;2021(1):niab039. doi: 10.1093/nc/niab039. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1093/nc/niab039
PMID:34804591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8599199/
Abstract

Many studies have shown that confidence and accuracy can be dissociated in a variety of tasks. However, most of these dissociations involve small effect sizes, occur only in a subset of participants, and include a reaction time (RT) confound. Here, I develop a new method for inducing confidence-accuracy dissociations that overcomes these limitations. The method uses an external noise manipulation and relies on the phenomenon of criterion attraction where criteria for different tasks become attracted to each other. Subjects judged the identity of stimuli generated with either low or high external noise. The results showed that the two conditions were matched on accuracy and RT but produced a large difference in confidence (effect appeared for 25 of 26 participants, effect size: Cohen's  = 1.9). Computational modeling confirmed that these results are consistent with a mechanism of criterion attraction. These findings establish a new method for creating conditions with large differences in confidence without differences in accuracy or RT. Unlike many previous studies, however, the current method does not lead to differences in subjective experience and instead produces robust confidence-accuracy dissociations by exploiting limitations in post-perceptual, cognitive processes.

摘要

许多研究表明,在各种任务中,信心和准确性可能会出现分离。然而,这些分离大多效应量较小,仅在一部分参与者中出现,并且存在反应时间(RT)混淆的问题。在此,我开发了一种诱导信心-准确性分离的新方法,该方法克服了这些局限性。该方法采用外部噪声操纵,并依赖于标准吸引现象,即不同任务的标准会相互吸引。受试者判断在低或高外部噪声条件下生成的刺激的身份。结果表明,两种条件在准确性和反应时间上相匹配,但在信心方面产生了很大差异(26名参与者中有25名出现了这种效应,效应量:科恩d值 = 1.9)。计算模型证实,这些结果与标准吸引机制一致。这些发现建立了一种新方法,可创造出信心差异大但准确性或反应时间无差异的条件。然而,与许多先前的研究不同,当前方法不会导致主观体验的差异,而是通过利用感知后认知过程中的局限性产生稳健的信心-准确性分离。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8599199/ec895e012fec/niab039f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8599199/fe3b72b6bba2/niab039f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8599199/4afa24a5e442/niab039f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8599199/76ae7bb33c46/niab039f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8599199/109af73e9229/niab039f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8599199/7414cb3a970d/niab039f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8599199/ec895e012fec/niab039f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8599199/fe3b72b6bba2/niab039f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8599199/4afa24a5e442/niab039f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8599199/76ae7bb33c46/niab039f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8599199/109af73e9229/niab039f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8599199/7414cb3a970d/niab039f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a6d/8599199/ec895e012fec/niab039f6.jpg

相似文献

1
A robust confidence-accuracy dissociation via criterion attraction.通过标准吸引实现稳健的信心-准确性分离。
Neurosci Conscious. 2021 Nov 15;2021(1):niab039. doi: 10.1093/nc/niab039. eCollection 2021.
2
Human-like dissociations between confidence and accuracy in convolutional neural networks.卷积神经网络中置信度与准确率之间类似人类的分离现象。
bioRxiv. 2024 Feb 4:2024.02.01.578187. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.01.578187.
3
Metacognitive Accuracy Improves With the Perceptual Learning of a Low- but Not High-Level Face Property.元认知准确性随着低水平而非高水平面部特征的知觉学习而提高。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 24;10:1712. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01712. eCollection 2019.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Fuzzy-trace theory: dual processes in memory, reasoning, and cognitive neuroscience.模糊痕迹理论:记忆、推理和认知神经科学中的双重加工
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2001;28:41-100. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(02)80062-3.
6
Priors and payoffs in confidence judgments.信心判断中的先验信息与回报
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Aug;82(6):3158-3175. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02018-x.
7
Subjective Confidence Predicts Information Seeking in Decision Making.主观信心预测决策中的信息寻求。
Psychol Sci. 2018 May;29(5):761-778. doi: 10.1177/0956797617744771. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
8
Reverse engineering of metacognition.元认知的反向工程。
Elife. 2022 Sep 15;11:e75420. doi: 10.7554/eLife.75420.
9
Confidence as a Priority Signal.置信度作为优先级信号。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Sep;31(9):1084-1096. doi: 10.1177/0956797620925039. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
10
Three consecutive weeks of nutritional ketosis has no effect on cognitive function, sleep, and mood compared with a high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet in healthy individuals: a randomized, crossover, controlled trial.连续三周的生酮饮食与高碳水化合物、低脂肪饮食相比,在健康个体中对认知功能、睡眠和情绪没有影响:一项随机、交叉、对照试验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Aug 1;110(2):349-357. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz073.

引用本文的文献

1
Automatic multisensory integration follows subjective confidence rather than objective performance.自动多感官整合遵循主观置信度而非客观表现。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Mar 11;3(1):38. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00221-w.
2
RTify: Aligning Deep Neural Networks with Human Behavioral Decisions.RTify:使深度神经网络与人类行为决策保持一致
ArXiv. 2024 Dec 26:arXiv:2411.03630v2.
3
A novel behavioral paradigm reveals the nature of confidence computation in multi-alternative perceptual decision making.一种新颖的行为范式揭示了多选项感知决策中信心计算的本质。

本文引用的文献

1
Consensus Goals in the Field of Visual Metacognition.视觉元认知领域的共识目标。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 Nov;17(6):1746-1765. doi: 10.1177/17456916221075615. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
2
Sources of Metacognitive Inefficiency.元认知效率低下的根源。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan;25(1):12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
3
Confidence can be automatically integrated across two visual decisions.信心可以在两个视觉决策之间自动整合。
Res Sq. 2024 Dec 11:rs.3.rs-5510856. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5510856/v1.
4
Challenging the Bayesian confidence hypothesis in perceptual decision-making.挑战贝叶斯置信度假设在知觉决策中的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Nov 26;121(48):e2410487121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2410487121. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
5
Dynamics of sensory and decisional biases in perceptual decision making: Insights from the face distortion illusion.知觉决策中感觉和决策偏差的动态变化:来自面部扭曲错觉的见解。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):317-325. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02539-8. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
6
You cannot "count" how many items people remember in visual working memory: The importance of signal detection-based measures for understanding change detection performance.人们无法“数出”在视觉工作记忆中记住的项目数量:基于信号检测的测量方法对于理解变化检测性能的重要性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Dec;48(12):1390-1409. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001055. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
7
On the assumptions behind metacognitive measurements: Implications for theory and practice.元认知测量背后的假设:对理论和实践的启示。
J Vis. 2022 Sep 2;22(10):18. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.10.18.
8
Suprathreshold perceptual decisions constrain models of confidence.阈上感知决策约束了置信模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jul 27;18(7):e1010318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010318. eCollection 2022 Jul.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Feb;47(2):161-171. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000884. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
4
The suboptimality of perceptual decision making with multiple alternatives.多选项感知决策的次优性。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 31;11(1):3857. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17661-z.
5
The nature of metacognitive inefficiency in perceptual decision making.元认知效率在知觉决策中的本质。
Psychol Rev. 2021 Jan;128(1):45-70. doi: 10.1037/rev0000249. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
The Confidence Database.信心数据库。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Mar;4(3):317-325. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0813-1. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
7
Temporal attention causes systematic biases in visual confidence.时间注意会导致视觉置信度的系统偏差。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 12;9(1):11622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48063-x.
8
Confidence Predictions Affect Performance Confidence and Neural Preparation in Perceptual Decision Making.置信度预测会影响感知决策中的表现信心和神经准备。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 11;9(1):4031. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40681-9.
9
Revealing subthreshold motor contributions to perceptual confidence.揭示阈下运动对知觉信心的影响。
Neurosci Conscious. 2019 Feb 18;2019(1):niz001. doi: 10.1093/nc/niz001. eCollection 2019.
10
Uncertainty information that is irrelevant for report impacts confidence judgments.与报告无关的不确定性信息会影响信心判断。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Dec;44(12):1981-1994. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000584.