强化物调查问卷准确性的进一步评估：一项系统性复制研究。
Further evaluation of the accuracy of reinforcer surveys: a systematic replication.
作者信息
Northup J
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 70803, USA.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):335-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-335.
Abstract
The present report evaluates the accuracy of a reinforcer survey by comparing the survey results to the results of subsequent reinforcer assessments for 20 children using a concurrent-operants arrangement to assess relative reinforcer preference. Total accuracy for the survey was determined to be approximately 57%. The results provide a systematic replication of Northup et al. (1996) with a much larger sample of children. A need for the development of more accurate and comprehensive reinforcer assessment methods for verbal children is discussed.
摘要
本报告通过将强化物调查结果与随后对20名儿童进行的强化物评估结果进行比较，评估了强化物调查的准确性，采用同时操作安排来评估相对强化物偏好。该调查的总体准确率约为57%。结果对Northup等人（1996年）的研究进行了系统的重复，样本中的儿童数量更多。文中讨论了为言语能力儿童开发更准确、更全面的强化物评估方法的必要性。
相似文献
1
Further evaluation of the accuracy of reinforcer surveys: a systematic replication.强化物调查问卷准确性的进一步评估：一项系统性复制研究。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):335-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-335.
2
A preliminary comparison of reinforcer assessment methods for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童强化物评估方法的初步比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Spring;28(1):99-100. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-99.
3
A procedure to teach self-control to children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.一种教注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童自我控制的方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Summer;33(2):233-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-233.
4
Behavioral assessment of impulsivity: a comparison of children with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.冲动性的行为评估：患与未患注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童的比较
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Spring;38(1):23-37. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.146-02.
5
Correspondence between single versus daily preference assessment outcomes and reinforcer efficacy under progressive-ratio schedules.单项偏好评估结果与递增比率强化效能之间的对应关系与每日偏好评估结果的关系。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):763-77. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-763.
6
A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.强化物评估方法的比较：言语和图片选择程序的效用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):201-12. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-201.
7
Physical exercise as a reinforcer to promote calmness of an ADHD child.
Behav Modif. 2006 Sep;30(5):564-70. doi: 10.1177/0145445504267952.
8
Evaluation of pharmacological treatment of impulsivity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童冲动行为的药物治疗评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Summer;38(2):135-46. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.116-02.
9
Effects of increased response effort and reinforcer delay on choice and aberrant behavior.反应努力增加和强化物延迟对选择及异常行为的影响。
Behav Modif. 2005 Jul;29(4):642-52. doi: 10.1177/0145445503259489.
10
Assessment of impulsivity and the development of self-control in students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍学生冲动性评估及自我控制能力发展研究
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):397-408. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-397.
引用本文的文献
1
Evaluating the Effects of Self-Monitoring of Performance with a Peer Component on Disruptive Behavior and Task Completion of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.评估带有同伴成分的表现自我监测对自闭症谱系障碍儿童破坏性行为和任务完成情况的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jun 28;14(7):547. doi: 10.3390/bs14070547.
2
The ABCs of incentive-based treatment in health care: a behavior analytic framework to inform research and practice.医疗保健中基于激励的治疗基础：一个为研究和实践提供信息的行为分析框架。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2014 Mar 19;7:103-14. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S59792. eCollection 2014.
3
Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value.考察应急性对强化物价值变化的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Fall;44(3):543-58. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-543.
4
Evaluation of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment method using activities as stimuli.使用活动作为刺激物评估无替换多选偏好评估方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):563-74. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-563.
本文引用的文献
1
Developing correspondence between the non-verbal and verbal behavior of preschool children.发展学前儿童的非言语行为和言语行为之间的一致性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Winter;1(4):267-81. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-267.
2
A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.强化物评估方法的比较：言语和图片选择程序的效用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):201-12. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-201.
3
The utility of verbal and behavioral assessments of value.价值的言语和行为评估的效用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):173-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-173.
Zotero 插件