注意缺陷多动障碍儿童强化物评估方法的初步比较。
A preliminary comparison of reinforcer assessment methods for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
作者信息
Northup J, Jones K, Broussard C, George T
机构信息
Louisiana State University.
出版信息
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Spring;28(1):99-100. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-99.
Abstract
We evaluated the relative treatment utility of a verbal forced-choice questionnaire, child nomination, and direct observation for identifying the most potent reinforcers for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Results demonstrated that all three methods were more likely to disagree than to agree, that a forced-choice format may enhance verbal reinforcer assessment, and that further development and evaluation of verbal reinforcer-assessment methods are needed.
摘要
我们评估了言语强制选择问卷、儿童提名和直接观察在确定注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童最有效的强化物方面的相对治疗效用。结果表明，这三种方法不一致的可能性大于一致的可能性，强制选择格式可能会增强言语强化物评估，并且需要对言语强化物评估方法进行进一步的开发和评估。
相似文献
1
A preliminary comparison of reinforcer assessment methods for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童强化物评估方法的初步比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Spring;28(1):99-100. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-99.
2
A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.强化物评估方法的比较：言语和图片选择程序的效用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):201-12. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-201.
3
Infrequent, but not frequent, reinforcers produce more variable responding and deficient sustained attention in young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).对于患有注意力缺陷多动障碍（ADHD）的幼儿来说，不频繁但也并非极少出现的强化物会导致更多变的反应以及持续注意力不足。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 May;47(5):457-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01468.x.
4
A procedure to teach self-control to children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.一种教注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童自我控制的方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Summer;33(2):233-7. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-233.
5
Behavioral assessment of impulsivity: a comparison of children with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.冲动性的行为评估：患与未患注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童的比较
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Spring;38(1):23-37. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.146-02.
6
Altered reinforcement mechanisms in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍中强化机制的改变。
Behav Brain Res. 1998 Jul;94(1):61-71.
7
Sequential evaluation of behavioral treatments and methylphenidate dosage for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.对注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童的行为治疗和哌甲酯剂量的序贯评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;36(3):375-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-375.
8
[Behavior therapy interventions in hyperkinetic disorders in preschool children].[学龄前儿童多动障碍的行为疗法干预]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr. 1991 Dec;19(4):254-62.
9
Effects of increased response effort and reinforcer delay on choice and aberrant behavior.反应努力增加和强化物延迟对选择及异常行为的影响。
Behav Modif. 2005 Jul;29(4):642-52. doi: 10.1177/0145445503259489.
10
Effects of choosing academic assignments on a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.选择学术作业对患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的学生的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Spring;30(1):181-3. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-181.
引用本文的文献
1
Evaluation of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment method using activities as stimuli.使用活动作为刺激物评估无替换多选偏好评估方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):563-74. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-563.
2
Effects of methylphenidate on sensitivity to reinforcement in children diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: an application of the matching law.哌甲酯对被诊断患有注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童强化敏感性的影响：匹配法则的应用
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Winter;33(4):573-91. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-573.
3
A comparison of verbal and tangible stimulus preference assessments.言语与实物刺激偏好评估的比较
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Fall;33(3):329-34. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-329.
4
A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.强化物评估方法的比较：言语和图片选择程序的效用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer;29(2):201-12. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-201.
本文引用的文献
1
The utility of verbal and behavioral assessments of value.价值的言语和行为评估的效用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Nov;54(3):173-84. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-173.
2
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
Zotero 插件