University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 33 Teachers College, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):563-74. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-563.
The current study examined the accuracy of the multiple-stimulus without replacement (MSWO) preference assessment for identifying preferred common classroom activities as reinforcers with children with behavioral disorders. The accuracy of predictions from the MSWO regarding high, medium, and low stimulus preference was tested by providing contingent access to activities for completing math problems within an independent seatwork format. Overall, there was an interaction effect between preference ranking (high, medium, or low) and number of problems completed. The results confirm and extend previous findings regarding the accuracy of predictions with the MSWO. The findings also reveal, however, some individual differences that may account for instances in which student behavior did not conform to predictions of stimulus preference assessments.
本研究考察了多刺激无替换(MSWO)偏好评估在识别具有行为障碍的儿童的常见课堂活动偏好作为强化物的准确性。通过提供与完成独立座位作业格式内数学问题相关的活动的附带访问权限,测试了 MSWO 对高、中、低刺激偏好的预测的准确性。总体而言,偏好排序(高、中或低)和完成的问题数量之间存在交互效应。结果证实并扩展了之前关于 MSWO 预测准确性的发现。然而,这些发现也揭示了一些个体差异,这些差异可能解释了学生行为不符合刺激偏好评估预测的情况。