• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊患者在家中的吸入器使用技术。

Inhaler technique of outpatients in the home.

作者信息

Johnson D H, Robart P

机构信息

Pulmonary and Critical Care Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2000 Oct;45(10):1182-7.

PMID:11054897
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assess the role of evaluation, instruction, and use of spacers by patients using metered dose inhalers (MDIs) in the home.

PATIENTS AND SETTING

Patients (age 64 +/- 15 y [mean +/- standard deviation]) receiving home visits by respiratory care practitioners for oxygen therapy had their inhaler technique checked.

INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS

A detailed acceptable/unacceptable check-off list was used with 172 patients to evaluate inhaler technique. Patients with poor technique were given instruction and their technique was reassessed. A subgroup of 43 patients was reevaluated on up to 3 visits.

RESULTS

Only 18% of patients using MDIs without spacers were rated acceptable with the detailed check list. Instruction improved inhaler technique, but few patients with initially poor technique without spacers developed fully acceptable technique. Improvements made immediately following instruction were lost when patients were reevaluated months later. Few patients received spacers after they were recommended. Technique was markedly better with spacers. Most patients (76%) had initially proper technique with spacers, and most who had poor technique could learn and retain proper technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Improper inhaler technique without spacers is very common among patients evaluated at home, and the majority of patients were unable to learn and retain proper technique. Most patients would benefit from using spacers with their inhalers. = 33 for first and second. = 26 for third. FRC = functional residual capacity. RV = residual volume. TLC = total lung capacity.¿., Fig. 3¿/PICK;0404f3;;;page;;;;yes;1¿ ¿/GRAPH;rk1000404003;comptd;;center;stack¿ ¿/CAPT;;;center;stack;2112n¿

摘要

目的

评估在家中使用定量吸入器(MDIs)的患者对吸入器的评估、指导及储雾罐使用情况的作用。

患者与环境

接受呼吸治疗师家访以进行氧疗的患者(年龄64±15岁[均值±标准差])接受了吸入器技术检查。

干预措施与测量

对172名患者使用一份详细的可接受/不可接受检查表来评估吸入器技术。技术不佳的患者接受指导并重新评估其技术。43名患者的亚组接受了多达3次的重新评估。

结果

在使用不带储雾罐的MDIs的患者中,只有18%在详细检查表中被评为可接受。指导改善了吸入器技术,但最初技术不佳且未使用储雾罐的患者中很少有人能形成完全可接受的技术。指导后立即出现的改善在数月后患者重新评估时消失。推荐使用储雾罐后,很少有患者使用。使用储雾罐时技术明显更好。大多数患者(76%)最初使用储雾罐时技术正确,大多数技术不佳的患者能够学习并保持正确技术。

结论

在家中接受评估的患者中,不使用储雾罐的吸入器技术不当非常普遍,大多数患者无法学习并保持正确技术。大多数患者使用带储雾罐的吸入器会受益。= 第一次和第二次为33。= 第三次为26。FRC = 功能残气量。RV = 残气量。TLC = 肺总量。¿., 图3¿/PICK;0404f3;;;页面;;;;是;1¿ ¿/图形;rk1000404003;comptd;;居中;堆叠¿ ¿/标题;;;居中;堆叠;2112n¿

相似文献

1
Inhaler technique of outpatients in the home.门诊患者在家中的吸入器使用技术。
Respir Care. 2000 Oct;45(10):1182-7.
2
Assessment of the inhalation technique in outpatients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using a metered-dose inhaler or dry powder device.使用定量吸入器或干粉装置对哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病门诊患者吸入技术的评估。
J Asthma. 1998;35(3):273-9. doi: 10.3109/02770909809068218.
3
Instruction of hospitalized patients by respiratory therapists on metered-dose inhaler use leads to decrease in patient errors.
Respir Care. 2005 Aug;50(8):1040-5.
4
Inhaler technique in older people in the community.社区中老年人的吸入器使用技巧。
Age Ageing. 2004 Mar;33(2):185-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh062.
5
An evaluation of children's metered-dose inhaler technique for asthma medications.一项针对儿童使用哮喘药物的定量吸入器技术的评估。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2005 Mar;40(1):167-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2004.08.010.
6
[Inadequate technique in the use of inhalers in patients seen at a pneumology clinic].[在一家肺病诊所就诊的患者中吸入器使用技术不当]
An Med Interna. 2001 Feb;18(2):69-73.
7
Inhalatory therapy training: a priority challenge for the physician.吸入疗法培训:医师面临的一项首要挑战。
Acta Biomed. 2007 Dec;78(3):233-45.
8
Characteristics predicting incorrect metered-dose inhaler technique in older subjects.
Arch Intern Med. 1996 May 13;156(9):984-8.
9
[Poor technique in the use of inhalation drugs by patients with chronic bronchitis/pulmonary emphysema].[慢性支气管炎/肺气肿患者吸入药物使用技术欠佳]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1994 Jul 9;138(28):1417-22.
10
Dry powder inhalers: which factors determine the frequency of handling errors?干粉吸入器:哪些因素决定了操作失误的频率?
Respiration. 2008;75(1):18-25. doi: 10.1159/000109374. Epub 2007 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
What can be done to impact respiratory inhaler misuse: exploring the problem, reasons, and solutions.可以采取哪些措施来影响呼吸吸入器的误用:探索问题、原因和解决方案。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020 Aug;14(8):791-805. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2020.1754800. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
2
Patients' practices and experiences of using nebuliser therapy in the management of COPD at home.患者在家中使用雾化器治疗 COPD 的实践和经验。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2015 Feb 24;2(1):e000076. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000076. eCollection 2015.
3
A role for pharmacists in respiratory education.
药剂师在呼吸教育中的作用。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2012 Mar;145(2):64-5. doi: 10.3821/145.2.cpj64.
4
Domiciliary experience of the Target Inhalation Mode (TIM) breathing maneuver in patients with cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者目标吸入模式(TIM)呼吸操的家庭体验。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2010 Apr;23 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S45-54. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2009.0777.
5
Adherence to disease management programs in patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对疾病管理计划的依从性。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2007;2(3):253-62.
6
The influence of formulation and spacer device on the in vitro performance of solution chlorofluorocarbon-free propellant-driven metered dose inhalers.制剂和间隔装置对无氯氟烃溶液推进剂驱动的定量吸入器体外性能的影响。
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2004 Feb 10;5(1):E7. doi: 10.1208/pt050107.
7
Gaps in the care of patients admitted to hospital with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期住院患者护理中的差距。
CMAJ. 2004 Apr 27;170(9):1409-13. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1030713.