Suppr超能文献

运动中的心流状态量表的层次验证性因素分析

Hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of the Flow State Scale in exercise.

作者信息

Vlachopoulos S P, Karageorghis C I, Terry P C

机构信息

Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki at Serres, Greece.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2000 Oct;18(10):815-23. doi: 10.1080/026404100419874.

Abstract

In this study, we examined the factor structure and internal consistency of the Flow State Scale using responses of exercise participants. This self-report questionnaire consists of nine subscales designed to assess flow in sport and physical activity. It was administered to 1231 aerobic dance exercise participants. Confirmatory factor analyses were used to test three competing measurement models of the flow construct: a single-factor model, a nine-factor model and a hierarchical model positing a higher-order flow factor to explain the intercorrelations between the nine first-order factors. The single-factor model showed a poor fit to the data. The nine-factor model and the hierarchical model did not show an adequate fit to the data. All subscales of the Flow State Scale displayed acceptable internal consistency (alpha > 0.70), with the exception of transformation of time (alpha = 0.65). Collectively, the present results do not provide support for the tenability of the single-factor, nine-factor or hierarchical measurement models in an exercise setting.

摘要

在本研究中,我们利用运动参与者的回答,检验了心流状态量表的因子结构和内部一致性。这份自陈式问卷由九个分量表组成,旨在评估运动和体育活动中的心流体验。该问卷施测于1231名有氧舞蹈运动参与者。验证性因子分析用于检验心流结构的三种竞争测量模型:单因素模型、九因素模型和一个假定有一个高阶心流因子来解释九个一阶因子之间相互关系的层级模型。单因素模型对数据的拟合度较差。九因素模型和层级模型对数据的拟合度也不充分。除了时间转换分量表(α = 0.65)外,心流状态量表的所有分量表都显示出可接受的内部一致性(α > 0.70)。总体而言,目前的结果并不支持单因素、九因素或层级测量模型在运动情境中的合理性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验