Kraincuk P, Kepka A, Ihra G, Schabernig C, Aloy A
Department of Anesthesiology and General Intensive Care, University of Vienna, Austria.
Crit Care. 1999;3(4):101-110. doi: 10.1186/cc351.
Adequate humidification in long-term jet ventilation is a critical aspect in terms of clinical safety. AIM: To assess a prototype of an electronic jet-ventilator and its humidification system. METHODS: Forty patients with respiratory insufficiency were randomly allocated to one of four groups. The criterion for inclusion in this study was respiratory insufficiency exhibiting a Murray score above 2. The four groups of patients were ventilated with three different respirators and four different humidification systems. Patients in groups A and B received superimposed high-frequency jet ventilation (SHFJV) by an electronic jet-ventilator either with (group A) or without (group B) an additional humidification system. Patients in group C received high-frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) by a pneumatic high-frequency respirator, using a hot water humidifier for warming and moistening the inspiration gas. Patients in group D received conventional mechanical ventilation using a standard intensive care unit respirator with a standard humidification system. SHFJV and HFPV were used for a period of 100 h (4days). RESULTS: A significantly low inspiration gas temperature was noted in patients in group B, initially (27.2 +/- 2.5 degrees C) and after 2 days (28.0 +/- 1.6 degrees C) (P < 0.05). The percentage of relative humidity of the inspiration gas in patients in group B was also initially significantly low (69.8 +/- 4.1%; P < 0.05) but rose to an average of 98 +/- 2.8% after 2 h. The average percentage across all four groups amounted to 98 +/- 0.4% after 2 h. Inflammation of the tracheal mucosa was found in patients in group B and the mucosal injury score (MIS) was significantly higher than in all the other groups. Patients in groups A, C and D showed no severe evidence of airway damage, exhibiting adequate values of relative humidity and temperature of the inspired gas. CONCLUSION: The problems of humidification associated with jet ventilation can be fully prevented by using this new jet-ventilator. These data were sustained by nondeteriorating MIS values at the end of the 4-day study period in groups A, C and D.
长期喷射通气中的充分湿化是临床安全性的关键方面。目的:评估一种电子喷射呼吸机及其湿化系统的原型。方法:40例呼吸功能不全患者被随机分为四组。纳入本研究的标准是呼吸功能不全且默里评分高于2分。四组患者分别使用三种不同的呼吸机和四种不同的湿化系统进行通气。A组和B组患者通过电子喷射呼吸机接受叠加高频喷射通气(SHFJV),A组使用额外的湿化系统,B组不使用。C组患者通过气动高频呼吸机接受高频振荡通气(HFPV),使用热水加湿器对吸入气体进行加温和湿化。D组患者使用配备标准湿化系统的标准重症监护病房呼吸机进行常规机械通气。SHFJV和HFPV使用100小时(4天)。结果:B组患者最初吸入气体温度显著较低(27.2±2.5℃),2天后(28.0±1.6℃)(P<0.05)。B组患者吸入气体的相对湿度百分比最初也显著较低(69.8±4.1%;P<0.05),但2小时后升至平均98±2.8%。2小时后所有四组的平均百分比为98±0.4%。发现B组患者气管黏膜有炎症,黏膜损伤评分(MIS)显著高于其他所有组。A组、C组和D组患者未显示出严重的气道损伤迹象,吸入气体的相对湿度和温度值适宜。结论:使用这种新型喷射呼吸机可完全避免与喷射通气相关的湿化问题。在为期4天的研究期结束时,A组、C组和D组的MIS值未恶化,支持了这些数据。