Suppr超能文献

用于高频喷射通气的不同加湿系统。

Different humidification systems for high-frequency jet ventilation.

作者信息

Doyle H J, Napolitano A E, Lippman H R, Cooper K R, Duncan J S, Eakins K, Glauser F L

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1984 Sep;12(9):815-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198409000-00031.

Abstract

This study examined the effect of several different high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) humidification techniques on tracheobronchial mucosa. Six groups (2 in each group) of mongrel dogs, chronically instrumented, were cared for in an intensive care-like setting for data acquisition. Four groups received HFJV with different humidification systems during 72 h of continuous ventilation. Two groups served as controls (conventional ventilation with and without humidity). Although there was significant damage to tracheal mucosa during ventilation without humidification, there were no significant pathologic differences in bronchial mucosa between humidified and nonhumidified groups. Several techniques of HFJV humidification produced no pathologic evidence of mucosal damage and could be clinically useful.

摘要

本研究考察了几种不同的高频喷射通气(HFJV)加湿技术对气管支气管黏膜的影响。将六组(每组2只)长期植入仪器的杂种犬置于类似重症监护的环境中进行护理,以采集数据。四组在持续通气72小时期间接受了采用不同加湿系统的HFJV。两组作为对照组(分别为有湿度和无湿度的传统通气)。尽管在无加湿通气期间气管黏膜有显著损伤,但加湿组和未加湿组的支气管黏膜在病理上并无显著差异。几种HFJV加湿技术未产生黏膜损伤的病理证据,可能具有临床应用价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验