• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术。一项前瞻性、随机对照比较的初步研究]

[Carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting. A pilot study of a prospective, randomized and controlled comparison].

作者信息

Link J, Manke C, Rosin L, Borisch I, Töpel I, Horn M, Mann S, Jauch K W, Bogdahn U, Feuerbach S, Kasprzak P

机构信息

Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg.

出版信息

Radiologe. 2000 Sep;40(9):813-20. doi: 10.1007/s001170050828.

DOI:10.1007/s001170050828
PMID:11056973
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A prospective, randomized and controlled trial is conducted to compare carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in high grade symptomatic carotid artery stenoses.

METHODS

According to the study design symptomatic patients with a angiographically high-grade (> or = 70%) internal carotid artery stenosis are included. Pre- and postinterventional diagnostics during the hospitalization period includes neurological assessment, duplex sonography of the cervical and cerebral arteries and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Follow-up examinations are scheduled after 1, 6 and 12 months and consist of a neurological assessment and duplex sonography. After 12 months selective angiography and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain will be performed additionally. During a period of 9 months up to now 23/137 patients treated for a carotid artery stenosis were included in the study, 11 patients underwent surgery and 12 patients carotid stenting.

RESULTS

Carotid stenting and endarterectomy was primarily successful without residual stenosis > 30% in each patient without the occurrence of stroke or death. In 18 follow-up examinations (neurological assessment including duplex sonography) of 13 patients (13 follow-up examinations after 30 days, 5 after 6 months) no relevant restenosis and no stroke occurred.

CONCLUSION

As of yet, carotid stenting was a safe procedure. Due to the small number of patients a definitive conclusion can not be drawn.

摘要

引言

开展一项前瞻性、随机对照试验,比较颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术治疗有症状的重度颈动脉狭窄的效果。

方法

根据研究设计,纳入血管造影显示为重度(≥70%)颈内动脉狭窄的有症状患者。住院期间干预前后的诊断包括神经学评估、颈部和脑动脉的双功超声检查以及脑部磁共振成像。随访检查安排在1、6和12个月后,包括神经学评估和双功超声检查。12个月后还将额外进行选择性血管造影和脑部磁共振成像。截至目前,在9个月的时间里,137例接受颈动脉狭窄治疗的患者中有23例被纳入研究,11例接受了手术,12例接受了颈动脉支架置入术。

结果

颈动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术初步成功,每位患者均无残余狭窄>30%,也未发生中风或死亡。在对13例患者进行的18次随访检查(包括双功超声检查的神经学评估)中(30天后进行了13次随访检查,6个月后进行了5次),未出现相关再狭窄和中风。

结论

目前,颈动脉支架置入术是一种安全的手术。由于患者数量较少,无法得出明确结论。

相似文献

1
[Carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting. A pilot study of a prospective, randomized and controlled comparison].[颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术。一项前瞻性、随机对照比较的初步研究]
Radiologe. 2000 Sep;40(9):813-20. doi: 10.1007/s001170050828.
2
High rate of restenosis after carotid artery stenting in patients with high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis. Medium-term follow-up.重度颈内动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉支架置入术后再狭窄率高。中期随访。
J Neurol. 2008 Sep;255(9):1309-14. doi: 10.1007/s00415-008-0875-x. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
3
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术对于外翻式内膜切除术术后复发性狭窄的治疗是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.
4
Alert for increased long-term follow-up after carotid artery stenting: results of a prospective, randomized, single-center trial of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉支架置入术后长期随访增加的警示:颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的前瞻性、随机、单中心试验结果
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jul;48(1):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.02.049. Epub 2008 May 16.
5
Combined carotid endarterectomy with transluminal angioplasty and primary stenting of the supra-aortic vessels.颈动脉内膜切除术联合经腔血管成形术及主动脉弓血管一期支架置入术。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2000 Oct;41(5):737-42.
6
[Early and late outcomes of carotid artery stenting].[颈动脉支架置入术的早期和晚期结果]
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2007 Jun;7(2):152-7.
7
Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial.支架保护血管成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗有症状狭窄2年的结果:一项多国、前瞻性、随机试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):893-902. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70196-0. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
8
[Carotid stenosis: diagnosis, patient selection, therapy].[颈动脉狭窄:诊断、患者选择、治疗]
Ther Umsch. 2003 Sep;60(9):563-8. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930.60.9.563.
9
Carotid artery stenting in a vascular surgery practice.血管外科实践中的颈动脉支架置入术。
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Mar;35(3):430-4. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.121209.
10
Poor durability of carotid angioplasty and stenting for treatment of recurrent artery stenosis after carotid endarterectomy: an institutional experience.颈动脉内膜剥脱术后复发性动脉狭窄行颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的耐久性差:一项机构经验。
J Vasc Surg. 2001 May;33(5):1008-14. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.113485.

引用本文的文献

1
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 25;2(2):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub5.
2
Does sex matter? Thirty-day stroke and death rates after carotid artery stenting in women versus men: results from the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) lead-in phase.性别有影响吗?女性与男性颈动脉支架置入术后30天的中风和死亡率:来自颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入试验(CREST)导入期的结果。
Stroke. 2009 Apr;40(4):1140-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541847. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
3
[Treatment of arteriosclerotic carotid stenosis: an overview].
[动脉硬化性颈动脉狭窄的治疗:综述]
Radiologe. 2004 Oct;44(10):936-45. doi: 10.1007/s00117-004-1115-8.
4
[Evaluation of stent-protected angioplasty for theray of symptomatic stenoses of the carotid artery. SPACE and other randomized trials].[颈动脉症状性狭窄支架置入术的评估。SPACE及其他随机试验]
Nervenarzt. 2003 Jun;74(6):482-8. doi: 10.1007/s00115-003-1507-4. Epub 2003 May 15.