• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[颈动脉症状性狭窄支架置入术的评估。SPACE及其他随机试验]

[Evaluation of stent-protected angioplasty for theray of symptomatic stenoses of the carotid artery. SPACE and other randomized trials].

作者信息

Ringleb P, Kunze A, Allenberg J R, Hennerici M, Jansen O, Maurer P C, Zeumer H, Hacke W

机构信息

Koordinationszentrum der SPACE-Studie, Neurologische Universitätsklinik, Neurologischen Klinik der Ruprect-Karls-Universität, Heidelberg.

出版信息

Nervenarzt. 2003 Jun;74(6):482-8. doi: 10.1007/s00115-003-1507-4. Epub 2003 May 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00115-003-1507-4
PMID:12799786
Abstract

During recent years, stent-protected angioplasty of the carotid artery (SPAC) has become an alternative to endartectomy (CEA) in many centers. Despite many case reports, case series, and open records, it has not been proven that these therapeutical regimens are comparable regarding complication rates and long-term outcome. Until now, only three randomized trials were published on this theme, two of them only as abstracts. This is not sufficient for answering the question of whether SPAC is a good alternative to CEA. At present, four major, randomized, multicenter trials are being run (EVA3S in France, CREST in the US, ICSS in Great Britain and several other countries, and SPACE in Germany and Austria). About 7,300 patients will be included in these trials. At present, 24 centers are participating in the SPACE trial, recruiting about 350 patients. It has been prospectively agreed that EVA-3S, ICSS, and SPACE will combine their results after completion of initial randomization and follow-up to conduct a combined European meta-analysis of the data. Three to 5 years are needed until these trials' final results will be published. Until then, stent-protected angioplasty should be done only under the consideration that it has not been scientifically evaluated.

摘要

近年来,在许多中心,颈动脉支架置入保护下的血管成形术(SPAC)已成为内膜切除术(CEA)的一种替代方法。尽管有许多病例报告、病例系列和公开记录,但尚未证实这些治疗方案在并发症发生率和长期疗效方面具有可比性。到目前为止,关于这个主题仅发表了三项随机试验,其中两项仅以摘要形式发表。这不足以回答SPAC是否是CEA的良好替代方法这一问题。目前,正在进行四项大型、随机、多中心试验(法国的EVA3S、美国的CREST、英国及其他几个国家的ICSS以及德国和奥地利的SPACE)。这些试验将纳入约7300名患者。目前,有24个中心参与SPACE试验,招募约350名患者。已前瞻性地达成共识,EVA - 3S、ICSS和SPACE将在完成初始随机分组和随访后合并其结果,以对数据进行欧洲联合荟萃分析。需要三到五年时间这些试验的最终结果才会公布。在此之前,进行颈动脉支架置入保护下的血管成形术时应仅在考虑到其尚未经过科学评估的情况下进行。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of stent-protected angioplasty for theray of symptomatic stenoses of the carotid artery. SPACE and other randomized trials].[颈动脉症状性狭窄支架置入术的评估。SPACE及其他随机试验]
Nervenarzt. 2003 Jun;74(6):482-8. doi: 10.1007/s00115-003-1507-4. Epub 2003 May 15.
2
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术:探索仍在继续。
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022.
3
Rationale and status of randomized controlled clinical trials in carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术随机对照临床试验的基本原理与现状
Semin Vasc Surg. 2003 Dec;16(4):311-6. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2003.08.009.
4
Ultrasound surveillance after CAS and CEA: what's the evidence?颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术术后的超声监测:证据有哪些?
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2014 Apr;55(2 Suppl 1):33-41.
5
Carotid artery stenting may be losing the battle against carotid endarterectomy for the management of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, but the jury is still out.在有症状的颈动脉狭窄治疗方面,颈动脉支架置入术可能正在输给颈动脉内膜切除术,但尚无定论。
Vascular. 2009 Jul-Aug;17(4):183-9. doi: 10.2310/6670.2009.00039.
6
Carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy: meta-analysis and diversity-adjusted trial sequential analysis of randomized trials.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术:随机试验的荟萃分析及多样性调整试验序贯分析
Arch Neurol. 2011 Feb;68(2):172-84. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.262. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
7
[Indications for treating stenoses of the carotid artery].
Chirurg. 2004 Jul;75(7):653-7. doi: 10.1007/s00104-004-0882-0.
8
Comparison of angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection versus endarterectomy for treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis in elderly patients.血管成形术和带脑保护装置的支架置入术与内膜切除术治疗老年患者颈内动脉狭窄的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Nov;40(5):945-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.08.022.
9
Stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis: meta-analysis of randomized trial data.颈动脉狭窄患者中支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较:随机试验数据的荟萃分析
Eur Radiol. 2008 Dec;18(12):2956-66. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1077-8. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
10
National trends in carotid artery revascularization surgery.颈动脉血运重建手术的国家趋势。
J Neurosurg. 2012 Jun;116(6):1251-7. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.JNS111320. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute and prophylactic endovascular treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis.颈内动脉狭窄的急性和预防性血管内治疗。
Klin Neuroradiol. 2009 Mar;19(1):31-7. doi: 10.1007/s00062-009-8037-9. Epub 2009 May 15.
2
Swine model of carotid artery atherosclerosis: experimental induction by surgical partial ligation and dietary hypercholesterolemia.颈动脉粥样硬化的猪模型:通过手术部分结扎和饮食性高胆固醇血症进行实验诱导。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Oct;27(9):1893-9.
3
Emergency carotid artery stenting in persistent hemodynamic deficit associated with severe carotid stenosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Carotid artery stent placement--ready for prime time?
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Jan;14(1):1-10. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000052285.26939.22.
2
[Endovascular therapy of high-degree stenoses of the neck vessels-stent-supported percutaneous angioplasty of the carotid artery without cerebral protection].[颈部血管高度狭窄的血管内治疗——无脑保护的支架辅助颈动脉经皮血管成形术]
Rofo. 2002 Dec;174(12):1506-10. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35936.
3
Angioplasty and stenting of the cervical carotid bifurcation: report of a 4-year series.
Neuroradiology. 2002 Feb;44(2):164-74. doi: 10.1007/s002340100680.
4
与严重颈动脉狭窄相关的持续性血流动力学缺陷的急诊颈动脉支架置入术。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Mar;26(3):549-52.
4
[Treatment of arteriosclerotic carotid stenosis: an overview].[动脉硬化性颈动脉狭窄的治疗:综述]
Radiologe. 2004 Oct;44(10):936-45. doi: 10.1007/s00117-004-1115-8.
5
[Indications for treating stenoses of the carotid artery].
Chirurg. 2004 Jul;75(7):653-7. doi: 10.1007/s00104-004-0882-0.
Carotid stenting and endarterectomy: a clinical and cost comparison of revascularization strategies.颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术:血管重建策略的临床与成本比较
Stroke. 2002 Apr;33(4):1063-70. doi: 10.1161/hs0402.105304.
5
Endovascular treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis using stent placement: long-term follow-up of patients with a balanced surgical risk/benefit ratio.使用支架置入术对有症状的颈动脉狭窄进行血管内治疗:手术风险/获益比平衡的患者的长期随访
Stroke. 2001 Aug;32(8):1855-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.8.1855.
6
Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial.颈动脉和椎动脉腔内血管成形术研究(CAVATAS)中颈动脉狭窄患者的血管内治疗与手术治疗:一项随机试验。
Lancet. 2001 Jun 2;357(9270):1729-37.
7
Technical aspects and current results of carotid stenting.颈动脉支架置入术的技术要点与当前结果
J Vasc Surg. 2001 May;33(5):1001-7. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.113483.
8
Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis.有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉支架置入术的近期和远期临床结局:一项5年前瞻性分析
Circulation. 2001 Jan 30;103(4):532-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.4.532.
9
[Carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting. A pilot study of a prospective, randomized and controlled comparison].[颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术。一项前瞻性、随机对照比较的初步研究]
Radiologe. 2000 Sep;40(9):813-20. doi: 10.1007/s001170050828.
10
Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement.全球颈总动脉支架置入经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000 Jun;50(2):160-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200006)50:2<160::aid-ccd2>3.0.co;2-e.