A forced choice comfort study of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% versus ketotifen fumarate 0.05%.

PURPOSE

To compare the ocular comfort of two ophthalmic anti-allergic agents: olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% and ketotifen fumarate 0.05%.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In a double-masked, multi-centered, randomized trial, 80 subjects were asked to make a 'forced choice' based on ocular comfort between one drop of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% instilled in one eye and one drop of ketotifen fumarate 0.05% instilled in the contralateral eye. At one site, the incidence of adverse reactions was also reported.

RESULTS

All subjects (100%) selected olopatadine as the more comfortable formulation. One site (n = 35) reported a 49% incidence of moderate burning and a 49% incidence of mild burning after ketotifen instillation. One subject (2% of population) at this site experienced no ocular discomfort with ketotifen. There were no reports of discomfort associated with olopatadine instillation.

CONCLUSION

Olopatadine is a more comfortable ophthalmic preparation than ketotifen.