Shu Y Y, Lao R C, Chiu C H, Turle R
Chemistry Department, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan, ROC.
Chemosphere. 2000 Dec;41(11):1709-16. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(00)00065-5.
The microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from harbor sediment reference material EC-1, marine sediment reference material HS-2 and PAH-spiked river bed soil was conducted. The extraction conditions for EC-1 were carried out at 70 degrees C and 100 degrees C under pressure in closed vessels with cyclohexane acetone (1:1), cyclohexane-water (3:1), hexane acetone (1:1), and hexane-water (3:1) for 10 min. A comparison between MAE and a 16-h Soxhlet extraction (SX) method showed that both techniques gave comparable results with certified values. MAE has advantages over the currently used Soxhlet technique due to a faster extraction time and lower quantity of solvent used. The consumption of organic solvent of the microwave method was less than one-tenth compared to Soxhlet.
开展了从港口沉积物标准物质EC - 1、海洋沉积物标准物质HS - 2和添加多环芳烃的河床土壤中微波辅助萃取(MAE)多环芳烃(PAHs)的研究。EC - 1的萃取条件是在70摄氏度和100摄氏度下,于密闭容器中,分别使用环己烷 - 丙酮(1:1)、环己烷 - 水(3:1)、己烷 - 丙酮(1:1)和己烷 - 水(3:1)作为萃取剂,萃取10分钟。微波辅助萃取法与16小时索氏萃取(SX)法的比较表明,两种技术得到的结果与标准值相当。由于萃取时间更短且使用的溶剂量更少,微波辅助萃取法相对于目前使用的索氏技术具有优势。与索氏萃取法相比,微波法的有机溶剂消耗量不到其十分之一。