• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿听力障碍的识别:围产期畸变产物耳声发射

Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.

作者信息

Gorga M P, Norton S J, Sininger Y S, Cone-Wesson B, Folsom R C, Vohr B R, Widen J E, Neely S T

机构信息

Multicenter Consortium on Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2000 Oct;21(5):400-24. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00003446-200010000-00007
PMID:11059701
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

  1. To describe distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels, noise levels and signal to noise ratios (SNRs) for a wide range of frequencies and two stimulus levels in neonates and infants. 2) To describe the relations between these DPOAE measurements and age, test environment, baby state, and test time.

DESIGN

DPOAEs were measured in 2348 well babies without risk indicators, 353 well babies with at least one risk indicator, and 4478 graduates of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). DPOAE and noise levels were measured at f2 frequencies of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 kHz, and for primary levels (L1/L2) of 65/50 dB SPL and 75/75 dB SPL. Measurement-based stopping rules were used such that a test did not terminate unless the response was at least 3 dB above the mean noise floor + 2 SDs (SNR) for at least four of five test frequencies. The test would terminate, however, if these criteria were not met after 360 sec. Baby state, test environment, and other test factors were captured at the time of each test.

RESULTS

DPOAE levels, noise levels and SNRs were similar for well babies without risk indicators, well babies with risk indicators, and NICU graduates. There was a tendency for larger responses at f2 frequencies of 1.5 and 2.0 Hz, compared with 3.0 and 4.0 kHz; however, the noise levels systematically decreased as frequency increased, resulting in the most favorable SNRs at 3.0 and 4.0 kHz. Response levels were least and noise levels highest for an f2 frequency of 1.0 kHz. In addition, test time to achieve automatic stopping criteria was greatest for 1.0 kHz. With the exception of "active/alert" and "crying" babies, baby state had little influence on DPOAE measurements. Additionally, test environment had little impact on these measurements, at least for the environments in which babies were tested in this study. However, the lowest SNRs were observed for infants who were tested in functioning isolettes. Finally, there were some subtle age affects on DPOAE levels, with the infants born most prematurely producing the smallest responses, regardless of age at the time of test.

CONCLUSIONS

DPOAE measurements in neonates and infants result in robust responses in the vast majority of ears for f2 frequencies of at least 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 kHz. SNRs decrease as frequency decreases, making the measurements less reliable at 1.0 kHz. When considered along with test time, there may be little justification for including an f2 frequency at 1.0 kHz in newborn screening programs. It would appear that DPOAEs result in reliable measurements when tests are conducted in the environments in which babies typically are found. Finally, these data suggest that babies can be tested in those states of arousal that are most commonly encountered in the perinatal period.

摘要

目的

1)描述新生儿和婴儿在广泛频率范围以及两种刺激水平下的畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAEAE)水平、噪声水平和信噪比(SNR)。2)描述这些DPOAE测量值与年龄、测试环境、婴儿状态和测试时间之间的关系。

设计

对2348名无风险指标的健康婴儿、353名至少有一项风险指标的健康婴儿以及4478名新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)毕业生进行了DPOAE测量。在1.0、1.5、2.0、3.0和4.0 kHz的f2频率下,以及65/50 dB SPL和75/75 dB SPL的初级水平(L1/L2)下测量DPOAE和噪声水平。采用基于测量的停止规则,即除非在五个测试频率中的至少四个频率上,响应至少比平均本底噪声+2标准差(SNR)高3 dB,否则测试不会终止。然而,如果在360秒后未满足这些标准,测试将终止。每次测试时记录婴儿状态、测试环境和其他测试因素。

结果

无风险指标的健康婴儿、有风险指标的健康婴儿和NICU毕业生的DPOAE水平、噪声水平和SNR相似。与3.0和4.0 kHz相比,在1.5和2.0 Hz的f2频率下有更大反应的趋势;然而,噪声水平随着频率增加而系统性降低,导致在3.0和4.0 kHz时SNR最有利。对于1.0 kHz的f2频率,响应水平最低,噪声水平最高。此外,达到自动停止标准的测试时间在1.0 kHz时最长。除了“活跃/警觉”和“哭闹”的婴儿外,婴儿状态对DPOAE测量影响很小。此外,测试环境对这些测量影响很小,至少对于本研究中婴儿进行测试的环境是这样。然而,在功能保温箱中测试的婴儿观察到最低的SNR。最后,年龄对DPOAE水平有一些细微影响,无论测试时的年龄如何,早产程度最高的婴儿产生的反应最小。

结论

对于至少2.0、3.0和4.0 kHz的f2频率,新生儿和婴儿的DPOAE测量在绝大多数耳朵中产生强烈反应。SNR随着频率降低而降低,使得在1.0 kHz时测量不太可靠。考虑到测试时间,在新生儿筛查项目中纳入1.0 kHz的f2频率可能没有什么道理。当在婴儿通常所在的环境中进行测试时,DPOAE似乎能产生可靠的测量结果。最后,这些数据表明可以在围产期最常见的觉醒状态下对婴儿进行测试。

相似文献

1
Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: distortion product otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.新生儿听力障碍的识别:围产期畸变产物耳声发射
Ear Hear. 2000 Oct;21(5):400-24. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00007.
2
Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: transient evoked otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.新生儿听力障碍的识别:围产期瞬态诱发耳声发射
Ear Hear. 2000 Oct;21(5):425-42. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00008.
3
Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.新生儿听力障碍的识别:瞬态诱发耳声发射、畸变产物耳声发射及听性脑干反应测试性能评估
Ear Hear. 2000 Oct;21(5):508-28. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00013.
4
Longitudinal Development of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants With Normal Hearing.正常听力婴儿畸变产物耳声发射的纵向发育。
Ear Hear. 2018 Sep/Oct;39(5):863-873. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000542.
5
Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.当使用2f1-f2和2f2-f1来预测听觉状态时畸变产物耳声发射测试的性能。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Apr;107(4):2128-35. doi: 10.1121/1.428494.
6
Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards.基于先验标准和多频听力测定标准的畸变产物耳声发射测试性能。
Ear Hear. 1999 Aug;20(4):345-62. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199908000-00007.
7
Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.正常听力成年人高频畸变产物耳声发射的重复性
Ear Hear. 2006 Oct;27(5):466-79. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000233892.37803.1a.
8
The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.常见刺激参数对畸变产物耳声发射精细结构的影响。
Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):239-49. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182321da4.
9
[Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in infants from birth to two months].[出生至两个月婴儿的畸变产物耳声发射]
Pro Fono. 2007 Apr-Jun;19(2):195-204. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872007000200008.
10
Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren: effects of ear asymmetry, handedness, and gender.学龄儿童的畸变产物耳声发射:耳不对称性、利手性和性别的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2001 Nov-Dec;12(10):506-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in newborn babies with and without late-term maternal iron deficiency anaemia.患有和未患晚期母体缺铁性贫血的新生儿的畸变产物耳声发射
J Otol. 2023 Jul;18(3):132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 27.
2
Assessment of Hearing Impairment in Sick Newborns: A Prospective Observational Study.患病新生儿听力障碍的评估:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):e40457. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40457. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
[The critical thoughts on diagnosis and treatment of childhood hearing loss].
[关于儿童听力损失诊断与治疗的批判性思考]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Mar;37(3):161-168. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.03.001.
4
Optimizing Clinical Interpretation of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants.优化婴幼儿畸变产物耳声发射的临床解读。
Ear Hear. 2018 Nov/Dec;39(6):1075-1090. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000562.
5
Longitudinal Development of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants With Normal Hearing.正常听力婴儿畸变产物耳声发射的纵向发育。
Ear Hear. 2018 Sep/Oct;39(5):863-873. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000542.
6
Long-Term Variability of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants and Children and Its Relation to Pediatric Ototoxicity Monitoring.婴儿和儿童畸变产物耳声发射的长期变异性及其与儿童耳毒性监测的关系。
Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr;41(2):239-253. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000536.
7
Current audiological diagnostics.当前的听力学诊断
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Dec 18;16:Doc09. doi: 10.3205/cto000148. eCollection 2017.
8
The influence of epidural anesthesia on new-born hearing screening: A pilot study.硬膜外麻醉对新生儿听力筛查的影响:一项初步研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2011 Jan;3(1):135-41. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.76493.
9
Wideband reflectance in newborns: normative regions and relationship to hearing-screening results.新生儿宽频反射:正常区域与听力筛查结果的关系。
Ear Hear. 2010 Oct;31(5):599-610. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e40ca7.
10
Effects of background noise on recording of portable transient-evoked otoacoustic emission in newborn hearing screening.背景噪声对新生儿听力筛查中便携瞬态诱发耳声发射记录的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Apr;267(4):495-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1080-y. Epub 2009 Aug 29.