Suppr超能文献

新生儿听力障碍的识别:围产期瞬态诱发耳声发射

Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: transient evoked otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.

作者信息

Norton S J, Gorga M P, Widen J E, Vohr B R, Folsom R C, Sininger Y S, Cone-Wesson B, Fletcher K A

机构信息

Multi-Center Consortium on Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2000 Oct;21(5):425-42. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00008.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

  1. To describe transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) levels, noise levels and signal to noise ratios (SNRs) for a range of frequency bands in three groups of neonates who were tested as a part of the Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment multi-center consortium project. 2) To describe the relations between these TEOAE measurements and age, test environment, baby state, and test time.

DESIGN

TEOAEs were measured in 4478 graduates of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), 353 well babies with at least one risk indicator, and 2348 well babies without risk factors. TEOAE and noise levels were measured for frequency bands centered at 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 kHz for a click stimulus level of 80 dB SPL. For those ears not meeting "passing" stopping criteria at 80 dB pSPL, a level of 86 dB pSPL was included. Measurement-based stopping rules were used such that a test did not terminate unless the response revealed a criterion SNR in four out of five frequency bands or no response occurred after a preset number of averages. Baby state, test environment, and other test factors were captured at the time of test.

RESULTS

TEOAE levels, noise levels and SNRs were similar for NICU graduates, well babies with risk factors and well babies without risk factors. There were no consistent differences in response quality as a function of test environment, i.e., private room, unit, open crib, nonworking isolette, or working isolette. Noise level varied little across risk group, test environment, or infant state other than crying, suggesting that the primary source of noise in TEOAE measurements is infant noise. The most significant effect on response quality was center frequency. Responses were difficult to measure in the half-octave band centered at 1.0 kHz, compared with higher frequencies. Reliable responses were measured routinely at frequencies of 1.5 kHz and higher.

CONCLUSIONS

TEOAEs are easily measured in both NICU graduates and well babies with and without risk factors for hearing loss in a wide variety of test environments. Given the difficulties encountered in making reliable measurements for a frequency band centered at 1.0 kHz, its inclusion in a screening program may not be justified.

摘要

目的

1)描述作为新生儿听力障碍识别多中心联合项目一部分接受测试的三组新生儿在一系列频带中的瞬态诱发耳声发射(TEOAE)水平、噪声水平和信噪比(SNR)。2)描述这些TEOAE测量值与年龄、测试环境、婴儿状态和测试时间之间的关系。

设计

对4478名新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的毕业生、353名有至少一项风险指标的健康婴儿以及2348名无风险因素的健康婴儿进行了TEOAE测量。对于80 dB SPL的短声刺激水平,测量了以1.0、1.5、2.0、3.0和4.0 kHz为中心的频带的TEOAE和噪声水平。对于在80 dB pSPL时未达到“通过”停止标准的耳朵,纳入了86 dB pSPL的水平。使用基于测量的停止规则,即除非响应在五个频带中的四个频带中显示出标准SNR,或者在预设的平均次数后没有响应,否则测试不会终止。在测试时记录婴儿状态、测试环境和其他测试因素。

结果

NICU毕业生、有风险因素的健康婴儿和无风险因素的健康婴儿的TEOAE水平、噪声水平和SNR相似。作为测试环境(即私人房间、病房、开放式婴儿床、不工作的保温箱或工作中的保温箱)的函数,响应质量没有一致的差异。除了哭闹外,噪声水平在风险组、测试环境或婴儿状态之间变化很小,这表明TEOAE测量中噪声的主要来源是婴儿噪声。对响应质量影响最显著的是中心频率。与较高频率相比,在以1.0 kHz为中心的半倍频程频带中很难测量到响应。在1.5 kHz及更高频率下常规测量到可靠的响应。

结论

在各种测试环境中,无论是NICU毕业生还是有和没有听力损失风险因素的健康婴儿,都很容易测量到TEOAE。鉴于在以1.0 kHz为中心的频带进行可靠测量时遇到困难,将其纳入筛查项目可能不合理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验