• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优先事项设定、公平与医疗保健:概念分析

Priority setting, justice, and health care: conceptual analysis.

作者信息

Nilstun T

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics, Lund University, Stora Gråbrödersgatan 16, SE-22222 Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Croat Med J. 2000 Dec;41(4):375-7.

PMID:11063758
Abstract

In this paper, priority setting in health care is defined as distributional decisions at the individual level involving clear and direct limitation of access to beneficial health care according to some categorical criterion other than the market. The justification of a particular rule of priority setting depends on conceptual issues as well as on the choice of value premises. Especially important is the type of scarcity involved (whether the imbalance between supply and need can be overcome or not) and the concept of justice used or presupposed (for instance, whether the conception of justice emphasizes efficiency or fairness or both). The proposal put forward is that the task of medical ethics is to provide conceptual clarification and value premises relevant to justify rules of priority setting. The actual choice of such rules belongs primarily to the domain of politics.

摘要

在本文中,医疗保健中的优先次序设定被定义为个体层面的分配决策,即根据除市场之外的某些分类标准,对获得有益医疗保健的机会进行明确且直接的限制。特定优先次序设定规则的正当性既取决于概念性问题,也取决于价值前提的选择。特别重要的是所涉及的稀缺类型(供应与需求之间的失衡能否被克服)以及所使用或预设的正义概念(例如,正义概念是强调效率还是公平或两者兼顾)。本文提出的观点是,医学伦理学的任务是提供与优先次序设定规则的正当性相关的概念澄清和价值前提。此类规则的实际选择主要属于政治领域。

相似文献

1
Priority setting, justice, and health care: conceptual analysis.优先事项设定、公平与医疗保健:概念分析
Croat Med J. 2000 Dec;41(4):375-7.
2
[Medical justice as a priority for Latin America].[医疗正义作为拉丁美洲的优先事项]
P R Health Sci J. 1997 Dec;16(4):429-36.
3
The Oregon initiative: ethics and priority setting.俄勒冈计划:伦理与优先事项设定。
Health Matrix Clevel. 1991 Summer;1(2):157-70; discussion 171-4.
4
Priorities and priority-setting in health care in the Netherlands.荷兰医疗保健中的优先事项与优先次序设定
Croat Med J. 1998 Sep;39(3):346-55.
5
The unethical focus on access: a study of medical ethics and the waiting-time guarantee.对医疗服务可及性的不道德关注:一项关于医学伦理与等待时间保障的研究
Scand J Public Health. 2009 Mar;37(2):117-21. doi: 10.1177/1403494808101359. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
6
Priority setting and the ethics of resource allocation within VA healthcare facilities: results of a survey.退伍军人事务部医疗设施内的优先事项设定与资源分配伦理:一项调查结果
Organ Ethic. 2008 Fall-Winter;4(2):83-96.
7
Priority dilemmas in psoriasis care and visions of a future care in a group of administrators, politicians and professionals in northern Sweden.瑞典北部一群管理人员、政治家和专业人士在银屑病护理中面临的优先级困境及对未来护理的展望。
Health Policy. 2008 Aug;87(2):203-16. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.01.005. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
8
Just health: On the conditions for acceptable and unacceptable priority settings with respect to patients' socioeconomic status.仅仅是健康:关于可接受和不可接受的以患者社会经济地位为优先条件的设置的条件。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Sep;37(9):526-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.042085. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
9
[Ethics--just priority setting. Interview by Kirsten Bjørnsson].[伦理学——合理的优先事项设定。克里斯汀·比约恩松访谈]
Sygeplejersken. 1993 Jul 7;93(27):10-3.
10
Priority setting in mental health services.精神卫生服务中的优先事项设定
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2002;1(2):65-74.

引用本文的文献

1
Legal Regulation, Financial Incentives and Professional Autonomy in the Prioritisation of Norwegian Specialist Health Services.挪威专科医疗服务优先级确定中的法律监管、经济激励与职业自主性
Health Care Anal. 2024 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s10728-024-00489-9.
2
Research priority setting for health policy and health systems strengthening in Nigeria: the policymakers and stakeholders perspective and involvement.尼日利亚卫生政策与卫生系统强化的研究重点设定:政策制定者与利益相关者的观点及参与情况
Pan Afr Med J. 2013 Sep 12;16:10. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2013.16.10.2318. eCollection 2013.
3
Setting priorities in global child health research investments: addressing values of stakeholders.
确定全球儿童健康研究投资的优先事项:考量利益相关者的价值观
Croat Med J. 2007 Oct;48(5):618-27.
4
Is cost-effectiveness analysis preferred to severity of disease as the main guiding principle in priority setting in resource poor settings? The case of Uganda.在资源匮乏地区确定优先事项时,成本效益分析是否比疾病严重程度更适合作为主要指导原则?以乌干达为例。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2004 Jan 8;2(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-2-1.