• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威专科医疗服务优先级确定中的法律监管、经济激励与职业自主性

Legal Regulation, Financial Incentives and Professional Autonomy in the Prioritisation of Norwegian Specialist Health Services.

作者信息

Bjorvatn Afsaneh, Nilssen Even

机构信息

SNF - Centre for Applied Research at NHH, Helleveien 30, NO-5045, Bergen, Norway.

Western Norway University of Social Sciences, Møllendalsveien 6, PO Box 7030, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2024 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s10728-024-00489-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10728-024-00489-9
PMID:39287707
Abstract

To study hospital physicians' awareness and perceptions of the legal and financial regulations, and their impact on professional discretion regarding equity in access to treatment and quality of care. A sample of 637 physicians in the Norwegian specialist healthcare services selected from a survey conducted by the Institute for Studies of the Medical Profession. The paper investigates how legal and financial policy instruments affect the application of professional discretion regarding the prioritisation of specialist health services. Descriptive statistics and regressions were conducted for the analyses. Compared with financial incentives, legal regulations (laws, priority rules and guidelines) were assessed to be less negative external interventions in the exercise of medical and professional judgement. The empirical analyses revealed a positive tendency in physicians' assessments of the impact of legal regulations on treatment equity and healthcare quality, but negative attitudes towards financial instruments. The variations revealed are attributable to various structural and epistemic features of the legal-bureaucratic and economic models of administration in this area of the welfare state. Legal and financial regulations are imposed to achieve certain social goals and values. The findings of this study can provide further insight for the health authorities in other countries concerning implementation of such regulations in the specialist healthcare services.

摘要

研究医院医生对法律和财务规定的认识与看法,以及这些规定对其在治疗可及性公平性和医疗质量方面专业裁量权的影响。从医学职业研究所在挪威专科医疗服务领域开展的一项调查中选取了637名医生作为样本。本文探讨法律和财务政策工具如何影响在专科医疗服务优先级方面专业裁量权的应用。分析采用了描述性统计和回归分析方法。与财务激励措施相比,法律规定(法律、优先规则和指南)在行使医疗和专业判断时被认为是负面影响较小的外部干预。实证分析显示,医生对法律规定对治疗公平性和医疗质量影响的评估呈积极趋势,但对财务工具持消极态度。所揭示的差异可归因于福利国家这一领域法律官僚和经济管理模式的各种结构和认知特征。实施法律和财务规定是为了实现某些社会目标和价值观。本研究结果可为其他国家的卫生当局在专科医疗服务中实施此类规定提供进一步的见解。

相似文献

1
Legal Regulation, Financial Incentives and Professional Autonomy in the Prioritisation of Norwegian Specialist Health Services.挪威专科医疗服务优先级确定中的法律监管、经济激励与职业自主性
Health Care Anal. 2024 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s10728-024-00489-9.
2
3
Financial arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.低收入国家卫生系统的财务安排:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 11;9(9):CD011084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011084.pub2.
4
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of financial incentives for prescribers.药品政策:针对开处方者的经济激励措施的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 4;2015(8):CD006731. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006731.pub2.
5
Perceived financial incentives, HMO market penetration, and physicians' practice styles and satisfaction.感知到的经济激励、健康维护组织(HMO)的市场渗透率以及医生的执业风格与满意度。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):307-21.
6
Unproven stem cell-based interventions & physicians' professional obligations; a qualitative study with medical regulatory authorities in Canada.未经证实的基于干细胞的干预措施与医生的职业义务;对加拿大医学监管机构的定性研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Oct 14;15:75. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-75.
7
Meeting social welfare legal needs in end-of-life care: co-creation of a system-wide research partnership.满足临终关怀中的社会福利法律需求:全系统研究伙伴关系的共同创建。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 11:1-21. doi: 10.3310/YGRA9852.
8
Law and medical practice: A comparative vignette survey of cardiologists in Norway and Denmark.法律与医疗实践:挪威和丹麦心脏病专家的比较性小插曲调查
SAGE Open Med. 2020 Sep 2;8:2050312120946215. doi: 10.1177/2050312120946215. eCollection 2020.
9
Successfully changing the mode of regulation in clinical priority setting: how organisational factors contributed to establishing the Norwegian priority guidelines for specialist health care services.成功改变临床优先级设置中的调节模式:组织因素如何促成挪威专科医疗保健服务优先级指南的建立。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2023 Jul;18(3):234-247. doi: 10.1017/S1744133123000014. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
10
; THE RIGHT TO HEALTH: UKRAINE'S INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS AND FINANCIAL ACTIVITY OF PUBLIC AUTHORITIES IN THE CONTEXT OF REFORMING THE NATIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM.健康权:乌克兰的国际义务以及国家医疗保健系统改革背景下公共当局的财政活动
Georgian Med News. 2020 Jul-Aug(304-305):177-182.

本文引用的文献

1
How Do Hospitals Respond to Price Changes?医院如何应对价格变化?
Am Econ Rev. 2005 Dec;95(5):1525-47. doi: 10.1257/000282805775014236.
2
Prioritising patient care: The different views of clinicians and managers.优先考虑患者护理:临床医生和管理者的不同观点。
Nurs Ethics. 2018 Sep;25(6):746-759. doi: 10.1177/0969733016664977. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
3
Ethical priority setting for universal health coverage: challenges in deciding upon fair distribution of health services.全民健康覆盖的伦理优先事项设定:卫生服务公平分配决策中的挑战。
BMC Med. 2016 May 11;14:75. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0624-4.
4
All things being equal: does it matter for equity how you organize and pay for health care? A review of the international evidence.在其他条件相同的情况下:你组织和支付医疗保健的方式对公平性有影响吗?对国际证据的回顾。
Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(3):457-77. doi: 10.2190/HS.44.3.c.
5
The effect of activity-based financing on hospital length of stay for elderly patients suffering from heart diseases in Norway.基于活动的融资对挪威老年心脏病患者住院时间的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 May 7;13:172. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-172.
6
Hospital readmission among elderly patients.老年患者的住院再入院率。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Oct;14(5):809-20. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0426-3. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
7
Making incentives work: hospital organisation and performance.激励机制的作用:医院组织与绩效。
Scand J Public Health. 2012 Jul;40(5):449-56. doi: 10.1177/1403494812454232. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
8
Trends in length of stay and short-term outcomes among Medicare patients hospitalized for heart failure, 1993-2006.1993-2006 年 Medicare 心力衰竭住院患者住院时间和短期结局的趋势。
JAMA. 2010 Jun 2;303(21):2141-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.748.
9
Am I my brother's gatekeeper? Professional ethics and the prioritisation of healthcare.我是我兄弟的守门人吗?职业道德与医疗保健的优先级
J Med Ethics. 2007 Sep;33(9):522-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.017871.
10
Priority setting, justice, and health care: conceptual analysis.优先事项设定、公平与医疗保健:概念分析
Croat Med J. 2000 Dec;41(4):375-7.