• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

In search of a new ethic for treating patients with chronic pain: what can medical boards do?

作者信息

Martino A M

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 1998 Winter;26(4):332-49, 263. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1998.tb01679.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1748-720x.1998.tb01679.x
PMID:11066893
Abstract

Author argues that a complex "ethic of underprescribing" underlies the continued reluctance of physicians to use opioids to treat chronic pain. She contends that state medical boards are uniquely positioned to promote a new ethic for pain management, but stresses the difficulties for boards in attaining this goal. She thinks success may hinge on whether boards can change their approach to pain management and persuade a skeptical medical community that adopting a risk for underprescribing will serve the long-term interests of patients and the profession.

摘要

相似文献

1
In search of a new ethic for treating patients with chronic pain: what can medical boards do?
J Law Med Ethics. 1998 Winter;26(4):332-49, 263. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1998.tb01679.x.
2
Commentary: the potential for unintended consequences from public policy shifts in the treatment of pain.评论:疼痛治疗方面公共政策转变产生意外后果的可能性。
J Law Med Ethics. 1998 Winter;26(4):350-2, 263. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1998.tb01680.x.
3
Criminal act or palliative care? Prosecutions involving the care of the dying.犯罪行为还是姑息治疗?涉及临终关怀的诉讼
J Law Med Ethics. 1998 Winter;26(4):308-31, 262. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1998.tb01678.x.
4
Achieving the right balance in oversight of physician opioid prescribing for pain: the role of state medical boards.在医师开具阿片类药物治疗疼痛的监管中实现恰当平衡:州医学委员会的作用
J Law Med Ethics. 2003 Spring;31(1):21-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00057.x.
5
State medical board members' beliefs about pain, addiction, and diversion and abuse: a changing regulatory environment.州医学委员会成员对疼痛、成瘾以及药物转移和滥用的看法:不断变化的监管环境。
J Pain. 2007 Sep;8(9):682-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
6
Caring for the dying--congressional mischief.照料临终者——国会的恶作剧。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 16;341(25):1923-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912163412509.
7
The role of the medical profession in physician discipline.医学专业在医师纪律处分中的作用。
JAMA. 1998 Jun 17;279(23):1915-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.23.1915.
8
Pain relief: the perspective of Catholic tradition.疼痛缓解:天主教传统的视角
J Pain Symptom Manage. 1992 Nov;7(8):485-91. doi: 10.1016/0885-3924(92)90135-5.
9
Damned if they do, damned if they don't: the need for a comprehensive public policy to address the inadequate management of pain.
Ann Health Law. 2004 Winter;13(1):81-144, table of contents.
10
Pain management: the ethical dilemma.疼痛管理:伦理困境。
Provider. 1998 May;24(5):44-6, 48, 50.

引用本文的文献

1
Oaths for physicians--necessary protection or elaborate hoax?医生誓言——必要的保护还是精心设计的骗局?
MedGenMed. 2007 Jan 10;9(1):7.
2
The undertreatment of pain: scientific, clinical, cultural, and philosophical factors.疼痛治疗不足:科学、临床、文化和哲学因素。
Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(3):277-88. doi: 10.1023/a:1012057403159.